Graduated driver licensing and safer driving.

Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) inserts between the leaner permit and full licensure an intermediate or "provisional" license that allows novices to drive unsupervised but subject to provisions intended to reduce the risks that accompany entry into highway traffic. Introduction of GDL has been followed by lowered accident rates, resulting from both limiting exposure of novices to unsafe situations and by helping them to deal with them more safely. Sources of safer driving include extended learning, early intervention, contingent advancement, and multistage instruction. To extend the learning process, most GDL systems lengthen the duration of the learner phase and require a specified level of adult-supervised driving. Results indicate that extended learning can reduce accidents substantially if well structured and highly controlled. Early intervention with novice traffic violators have shown both a general deterrent effect upon novice violators facing suspension and a specific effect upon those who have experienced it. Making advancement to full licensure contingent upon a violation-free record when driving on the provisional license has also evidenced a reduction in accidents and violations during that phase of licensure. Multistage instruction attempts development of advanced skills only after novices have had a chance to master more basic skills. Although this element of GDL has yet to be evaluated, research indicates crash reduction is possible in situations where it does not increase exposure to risk. While the various elements of GDL have demonstrated potential benefit in enhancing the safety of novice drivers, considerable improvement in the nature and enforcement of GDL requirements is needed to realize that potential.

[1]  W B Wilson,et al.  MODEL FOR PROVISIONAL (GRADUATED) LICENSING OF YOUNG NOVICE DRIVERS , 1977 .

[2]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Sixteen years age limit for learner drivers in Sweden--an evaluation of safety effects. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  B G Simons-Morton,et al.  Promoting parental management of teen driving , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[4]  L U Ray,et al.  Motor vehicle occupant crashes among teens: impact of the graduated licensing law in San Diego. , 2001, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[5]  C R Lockwood,et al.  The accident liability of car drivers , 1991 .

[6]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Responses of teenagers and their parents to California's graduated licensing system. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  EFFECTS OF FLORIDA'S GRADUATED LICENSING PROGRAM ON THE BEHAVIORS AND ATTITUDES OF TEENAGERS , 2001 .

[8]  A F Williams,et al.  Rationale for graduated licensing and the risks it should address , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[9]  Barnie Jones,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROVISIONAL LICENSING IN OREGON: AN ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC SAFETY BENEFITS , 1994 .

[10]  J Bouchard,et al.  THE QUEBEC GRADUATED LICENSING SYSTEM FOR NOVICE DRIVERS: A TWO-YEAR EVALUATION OF THE 1997 REFORM , 2000 .

[11]  Robert A. Hagge,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPACT OF PROVISIONAL LICENSING. FINAL REPORT , 1987 .

[12]  A J McKnight,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF LIMITED LICENSE SUSPENSION. FINAL REPORT , 1986 .

[13]  Mei-Li Lin,et al.  The provisional license: nighttime and passenger restrictions--a literature review. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[14]  J L Ford IMPROVED MOTORCYCLIST LICENSING AND TESTING PROJECT , 1981 .

[15]  R A Hagge,et al.  THE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPACT OF PROVISIONAL LICENSING , 1988 .

[16]  R C Peck,et al.  IMPROVED MOTORCYCLIST LICENSING AND TESTING PROJECT. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , 1980 .

[17]  A J McKnight,et al.  YOUTH LICENSE CONTROL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT , 1983 .

[18]  A Glad PHASE 2 IN THE DRIVER EDUCATION: EFFECT ON THE ACCIDENT RISK , 1988 .