How Future Teachers Develop Professional Knowledge Through Reflective Writing in a Dialogical Frame

This paper is based on an intervention study. It deals with research that tackles the development of professional knowledge appropriation in future teachers before they teach reading and writing (or “literacy”) in primary classrooms (ages 6–12). During the intervention, peer discussion and reflective writing tasks were organized so that students think about what it means to teach reading and writing today, in theoretical and practical terms. Each student collected many reflective texts in a personal portfolio. After the intervention, a second phase of research began. We created qualitative tools to describe and interpret how these pre-service teachers had progressively built professional knowledge about literacy teaching. First, we established five “clusters” from indicators such as students’ initial and final attitudes towards reading and writing, involvement in the training activities and progression in semiotic and reflective abilities. Then, we selected five students’ portfolios (one per cluster) and proceeded to the written discourse analysis. This analysis was based on a listing of the three main categories that concerned the topics the students developed from one text to another: the reflective operations visible in the texts; and the linguistic ways of enunciation. Five different reflective pathways were identified: “comprehensive”, “prescriptive”, “pragmatic”, “heuristic-critical” and “resistant”.

[1]  Sylvia Scribner,et al.  Literacy in Three Metaphors , 1984, American Journal of Education.

[2]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[3]  D. Clandinin,et al.  Knowledge, Narrative And Self-Study , 2004 .

[4]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  Growth of Literacy Engagement: Changes in Motivations and Strategies During Concept‐Oriented Reading Instruction , 1996 .

[5]  Magda Becker Soares Literacy assessment and its implications for statistical measurement , 1992 .

[6]  Jabari Mahiri,et al.  Rewriting Identity: Social Meanings of Literacy and “Re‐visions” of Self , 1998 .

[7]  Diane Holt-Reynolds,et al.  Personal History-Based Beliefs as Relevant Prior Knowledge in Course Work , 1992 .

[8]  Ana Luiza Bustamante Smolka,et al.  Sociocultural studies of mind: The constitution of the subject: a persistent question , 1995 .

[9]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Engagement and Motivation in Reading , 2000 .

[10]  M. Cole Sociocultural studies of mind: Socio-cultural-historical psychology: some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of culturalgenetic methodology , 1995 .

[11]  J. Bronckart Activité langagière, textes et discours – Pour un interactionisme socio-discursif , 1996 .

[12]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky , 1987 .

[13]  Helen Freidus,et al.  The Reflective Portfolio in Self-Study: Inquiring Into and Representing A Knowledge of Practice , 2004 .

[14]  B. Rogoff Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship , 1995 .

[15]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[16]  C. Wagner Developing Literacy Portfolios in Teacher Education Courses. , 1994 .

[17]  J. Bronckart Theories of action, speech, natural language, and discourse , 1995 .

[18]  F. Paulson What Makes a Portfolio a Portfolio , 1991 .

[19]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Analyse des données qualitatives , 2003 .

[20]  Jean-Paul Bronckart,et al.  Vygotsky aujourd'hui , 1985 .

[21]  Diane Bottomley,et al.  Assessing Children's Views about Themselves as Writers Using the Writer Self-Perception Scale. , 1998 .

[22]  J. Habermas The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[23]  G. L. Collected Papers , 1912, Nature.

[24]  Robert J. Tierney,et al.  Portfolio Assessment in the Reading Writing Classroom , 1991 .

[25]  É. Benveniste Problèmes de linguistique générale , 1968 .

[26]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  Lively Discussions! Fostering Engaged Reading. , 1996 .

[27]  Gissi Sarig Academic Literacy as Ways of Getting-to-Know: What Can be Assessed? , 1996 .

[28]  A. Elliott The Constitution of the Subject , 2005 .

[29]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[30]  Cathy M. Roller Learning To Teach Reading: Setting the Research Agenda. , 2001 .

[31]  A. Stetsenko Tool and Sign in the Development of the Child , 2004 .

[32]  Louise M. Rosenblatt,et al.  The Transactional Theory of Reading and Writing , 2018, Theoretical Models and Processes of Literacy.

[33]  Theodore L. Harris,et al.  The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing , 1995 .

[34]  S. Terwagne,et al.  Les cercles de lecture , 2006 .