Identity politics by design: users, markets and the public service provision for assistive technology in Norway

This article discusses the significance of aesthetics and individual design within assistive technology (AT) and argues that its importance for quality of life has been a neglected issue in the public service provision. The market structure, demands for an effective administration combined with a clinical approach to disability within public services construes a rigid service system disempowering active users. Based on personal interviews with wheelchair users and people who are hard of hearing in Norway, the article presents an analysis of how people use and look upon their AT. The relationship between user, product and society is analysed as representation of identities, as strategies of distinctions and as different ways of opposing the patient role.

[1]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Beyond Left and Right , 2004 .

[2]  Nick Watson,et al.  Well, I Know this is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don't See Myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and disability , 2002 .

[3]  Z. Bauman.  Work, consumerism and the new poor , 1998 .

[4]  B. Latour.  Aramis, or the Love of Technology , 1993 .

[5]  Karin Barron.  Who am I? Women with learning difficulties (re)constructing their self-identity , 2002 .

[6]  John Clarke,et al.  Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services , 2007 .

[7]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[8]  Jan-Kåre Breivik.  Deaf identities in the making , 2005 .

[9]  R. G. Thomson,et al.  Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature , 1996 .

[10]  Margaret R. Somers.  The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach , 1994 .

[11]  H. Dittmar.  The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be , 1992 .

[12]  C. Hocking.  Having and using objects in the western world , 2000 .

[13]  Ann Rudinow Sætnan,et al.  On gender and things: Reflections on an exhibition on gendered artifacts , 2002 .

[14]  P. Solvang,et al.  Service Provision for an Independent Life , 2003 .

[15]  Peter Anderberg,et al.  FACE Disabled People, Technology and Internet , 2006 .

[16]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. , 2002 .

[17]  Susan Wendell,et al.  The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability , 1996 .

[18]  Glenis Donaldson,et al.  The Social Implications of Increases in Wheelchair Use. , 2004 .

[19]  Nick Watson,et al.  The social and technological history of wheelchairs , 2004 .

[20]  Choosing a Wheelchair: A Guide for Optimal Independence , 1998 .

[21]  Barbara Fawcett.  Feminist Perspectives on Disability , 2000 .

[22]  Stuart S. Blume,et al.  "Citizens as users of technology: An exploratory study of vaccines and vaccination" , 2003 .

[23]  Michael Oliver,et al.  The Politics of Disablement , 1990 .

[24]  Clarke John,et al.  Consumerism and the reform of public services: inequalities and instabilities , 2005 .

[25]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  Disability in Daily Life Activities and Visual Impairment A population study of 85-year-old people living at home , 2000 .