Water and carbon footprint reduction potential of renewable energy in the United States: A policy analysis using system dynamics

Abstract Renewable energy has gained popularity as an alternative to fossil fuels, which regularly emit large amounts of Greenhouse Gases and consume/withdraw large amounts of water, but renewable energy market penetration is still limited while fossil fuels are still the U.S.‘s dominant power source. This is due to resistance in the market, or in this case, the failure of renewable energy policies to achieve long-term environmental sustainability due to neglected external factors (economic, societal, etc.). No available literature analyzes potential sources and/or effects of this policy resistance, so this research investigates the underlying mechanisms in the renewable energy generation market by utilizing a system dynamics model. A two-alternative Generalized Bass Model was developed to simulate the renewable energy market (specifically with respect to solar PV and wind energy), including the environmental, societal, and economic concerns associated with each of the alternatives evaluated in this study, so as to identify and address possible causes of policy resistance and its subsequent effects on environmental impacts (esp. GHG emissions and water withdrawal rates). Based on this model, three separate policy areas (solar PV investments, wind power investments, and the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies) and various combinations thereof were proposed and tested within the context of the model. Based on the results of this study, it is highly recommended to invest as generously as possible into multiple renewable energy industries, reduce fossil fuel subsidies (in turn freeing up funding for renewable energy investments), and seek further advancement in renewable energy technologies (e.g. enhancing the useable lifetimes of wind turbines). A balanced policy have potential to increase the share of renewable's up to roughly 40% in the U.S. by 2050, as well as 17% and 32% GHG and water withdrawal reduction potential by 2050.

[1]  Narjes Nouri,et al.  Water withdrawal and consumption reduction analysis for electrical energy generation system , 2015 .

[2]  Dominic C.Y. Foo,et al.  Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning , 2007 .

[3]  C. Cooper,et al.  Air Pollution Control : A Design Approach , 1990 .

[4]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Public transportation adoption requires a paradigm shift in urban development structure , 2017 .

[5]  A. Krupnick,et al.  The True Cost of Electric Power An Inventory of Methodologies to Support Future Decisionmaking in Comparing the Cost and Competitiveness of Electricity Generation Technologies , 2012 .

[6]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life-cycle uses of water in U.S. electricity generation , 2010 .

[7]  M. Kucukvar,et al.  Material dependence of national energy development plans: The case for Turkey and United Kingdom , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Dynamic Simulation Models for Road Safety and Its Sustainability Implications , 2015 .

[9]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained planningfor sustainable power generation , 2009 .

[10]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Investigating carbon footprint reduction potential of public transportation in United States: A system dynamics approach , 2016 .

[11]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  A framework for water and carbon footprint analysis of national electricity production scenarios , 2017 .

[12]  Mohammad Kazem Sheikh-El-Eslami,et al.  A system dynamics approach for investigating impacts of incentive mechanisms on wind power investment , 2012 .

[13]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Carbon and energy footprints of electric delivery trucks: A hybrid multi-regional input-output life cycle assessment , 2016 .

[14]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision making framework based on life cycle environmental, economic and social impacts: The case of U.S. wind energy , 2016 .

[15]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Exploring the material footprints of national electricity production scenarios until 2050: The case for Turkey and UK , 2017 .

[16]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Alternative Passenger Vehicles , 2014 .

[17]  Y. Barlas Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models , 1989 .

[18]  Sgouris Sgouridis,et al.  A Framework for Defining Sustainable Energy Transitions: Principles, Dynamics, and Implications , 2014 .

[19]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Towards greening the U.S. residential building stock: A system dynamics approach , 2014 .

[20]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives , 2017 .

[22]  S. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Cost optimal energy sector planning: a Pinch Analysis approach , 2016 .

[23]  Michael Mutingi Understanding the dynamics of the adoption of renewable energy technologies: A system dynamics approach , 2013 .

[24]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Integration of system dynamics approach toward deepening and broadening the life cycle sustainability assessment framework: a case for electric vehicles , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Brendan Beck,et al.  The IEA CCS Technology Roadmap: One Year On , 2011 .

[26]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Unified pinch approach for targeting of carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems with multiple time periods and regions , 2014 .

[27]  P. Helo,et al.  Role of renewable energy policies in energy dependency in Finland: System dynamics approach , 2014 .

[28]  Ken’ichi Matsumoto,et al.  Investors' perspective on determinants of foreign direct investment in wind and solar energy in developing economies – Review and expert opinions , 2018 .

[29]  R C Shreckengost,et al.  Dynamic simulation models: how valid are they? , 1985, NIDA research monograph.

[30]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs on solar PV installations , 2012 .

[31]  Martin J. Pasqualetti,et al.  Social Barriers to Renewable Energy Landscapes* , 2011 .

[32]  Jörn-Henrik Thun The Diffusion of System Dynamics analyzed with System Dynamics-A Diffusion Model Considering Network Externalities , 2008 .

[33]  Ali Azadeh,et al.  Biodiesel supply chain optimization via a hybrid system dynamics-mathematical programming approach. , 2016 .

[34]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Uncertainty-embedded dynamic life cycle sustainability assessment framework: An ex-ante perspective on the impacts of alternative vehicle options , 2016 .

[35]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Energy-climate-manufacturing nexus: New insights from the regional and global supply chains of manufacturing industries , 2016 .

[36]  C. Castro,et al.  From fossil fuels to renewable energies , 2008 .

[37]  Omer Tatari,et al.  The Climate Change-Road Safety-Economy Nexus: A System Dynamics Approach to Understanding Complex Interdependencies , 2017, Syst..

[38]  Charles Mbohwa,et al.  A Framework for Analysis and Evaluation of Renewable Energy Policies , 2014 .

[39]  Nuri Cihat Onat,et al.  Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework for the U.S. Transportation , 2015 .

[40]  Trieu Mai,et al.  Meta-analysis of high penetration renewable energy scenarios , 2014 .

[41]  Juneseuk Shin,et al.  Long-term renewable energy technology valuation using system dynamics and Monte Carlo simulation: Photovoltaic technology case , 2014 .

[42]  O. Tatari,et al.  Well-to-wheel water footprints of conventional versus electric vehicles in the United States: A state-based comparative analysis , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.