Determining the point of minimum error for 6DOF pose uncertainty representation

In many augmented reality applications, in particular in the medical and industrial domains, knowledge about tracking errors is important. Most current approaches characterize tracking errors by 6×6 covariance matrices that describe the uncertainty of a 6DOF pose, where the center of rotational error lies in the origin of a target coordinate system. This origin is assumed to coincide with the geometric centroid of a tracking target. In this paper, we show that, in case of a multi-camera fiducial tracking system, the geometric centroid of a body does not necessarily coincide with the point of minimum error. The latter is not fixed to a particular location, but moves, depending on the individual observations. We describe how to compute this point of minimum error given a covariance matrix and verify the validity of the approach using Monte Carlo simulations on a number of scenarios. Looking at the movement of the point of minimum error, we find that it can be located surprisingly far away from its expected position. This is further validated by an experiment using a real camera system.

[1]  Tyrone L. Vincent,et al.  Analysis of Head Pose Accuracy in Augmented Reality , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[2]  Gudrun Klinker,et al.  Spatial relationship patterns: elements of reusable tracking and calibration systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[3]  Wolfgang Niemeier,et al.  Ausgleichungsrechnung: Statistische Auswertemethoden , 2008 .

[4]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[5]  Richard L. Holloway,et al.  Registration errors in augmented reality systems , 1996 .

[6]  Blair MacIntyre,et al.  OSGAR: a scene graph with uncertain transformations , 2004, Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[7]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[8]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  H. Hastedt MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION IN CLOSE-RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2004 .

[10]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Predicting accuracy in pose estimation for marker-based tracking , 2003, The Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[11]  Duane C. Brown,et al.  Close-Range Camera Calibration , 1971 .

[12]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Online Estimation of the Target Registration Error for n -Ocular Optical Tracking Systems , 2007, MICCAI.

[13]  K. Kraus Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans , 2007 .

[14]  Greg Welch,et al.  A general method for comparing the expected performance of tracking and motion capture systems , 2005, VRST '05.

[15]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  A method for designing marker-based tracking probes , 2004, Third IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[17]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Predicting and estimating the accuracy of n-occular optical tracking systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[18]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.