Identifying where you are in a room: Sensitivity to room acoustics

In a spatial auditory display, reverberation provides a reliable cue for source distance, increases the subjective realism of the display, and improves the externalization of simulated sound sources. However, relatively little is known about perceptual sensitivity to differences in reverberation patterns or how precisely reverberation must be simulated in a spatial auditory display. This paper presents preliminary results of a study examining sensitivity to changes in listener location in a simulated room. Results suggest that monaural cues in the ear receiving the least direct-sound energy provide the most salient cues for identifying room location. However, many details in the reverberation pattern are not easily perceived. These results indicate that including reverberation from simplified room models may provide the benefits of reverberation without noticeably degrading the realism of the display.

[1]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function, I. General room acoustics , 1980 .

[3]  A. D. Little,et al.  Effects of Room Reflectance and Background Noise on Perceived Auditory Distance , 1989, Perception.

[4]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Effect of reverberation on spatial unmasking for nearby speech sources , 2001 .

[5]  B.G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Empirical and modeled acoustic transfer functions in a simple room: effects of distance and direction , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (Cat. No.01TH8575).

[6]  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham.  LOCALIZING SOUND IN ROOMS , 2001 .

[7]  Tara J. Brown.  Characterization of acoustic head-related transfer functions for nearby sources , 2000 .

[8]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham.  SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY, SPATIAL UNMASKING, AND REALISM IN REVERBERANT SPATIAL AUDITORY DISPLAYS , 2002 .

[9]  Durand R. Begault,et al.  EARLY REFLECTION THRESHOLDS FOR VIRTUAL SOUND SOURCES , 2001 .

[10]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  On the Externalization of Auditory Images , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  B. Shinn-Cunningham.  DISTANCE CUES FOR VIRTUAL AUDITORY SPACE , 2000 .

[13]  Mark R. Anderson,et al.  Direct comparison of the impact of head tracking, reverberation, and individualized head-related transfer functions on the spatial perception of a virtual speech source. , 2001, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. Audio Engineering Society.

[14]  John Vanderkooy,et al.  Aspects of MLS Measuring Systems , 1994 .