A multiscaled model of southwestern willow flycatcher breeding habitat

The southwestern willow flycatcher (SWFL; Empidonax traillii extimus) is an endangered songbird whose habitat has declined dramatically over the last century. Understanding habitat selection patterns and the ability to identify potential breeding areas for the SWFL is crucial to the management and conservation of this species. We developed a multiscaled model of SWFL breeding habitat with a Geographic Information System (GIS), survey data, GIS variables, and multiple logistic regressions. We obtained presence and absence survey data from a river-ine ecosystem and a reservoir delta in south-central Arizona, USA, in 1999. We extracted the GIS variables from satellite imagery and digital elevation models to characterize vegetation and floodplain within the project area. We used multiple logistic regressions within a cell-based (30 x 30 m) modeling environment to (1) determine associations between GIS variables and breeding-site occurrence at different spatial scales (0.09-72 ha), and (2) construct a predictive model. Our best model explained 54% of the variability in breeding-site occurrence with the following variables: vegetation density at the site (0.09 ha), proportion of dense vegetation and variability in vegetation density within a 4.5-ha neighborhood, and amount of floodplain or flat terrain within a 41-ha neighborhood. The density of breeding sites was highest in areas that the model predicted to be most suitable within the project area and at an external test site 200 km away. Conservation efforts must focus on protecting not only occupied patches, but also surrounding riparian forests and floodplain to ensure long-term viability of SWFL. We will use the multiscaled model to map SWFL breeding habitat in Arizona, prioritize future survey effort, and examine changes in habitat abundance and quality over time.

[1]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology , 1993 .

[2]  S. Stoleson,et al.  Status, Ecology, and Conservation of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher , 2000 .

[3]  W. M. V. Haegen,et al.  Shrubsteppe Bird Response to Habitat and Landscape Variables in Eastern Washington, U.S.A. , 2000 .

[4]  Foraging and habitat relationships of the sibling species Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii) and Alder Flycatcher (E. alnorum) in southern Ontario , 1983 .

[5]  V. Saab.  IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL SCALE TO HABITAT USE BY BREEDING BIRDS IN RIPARIAN FORESTS: A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[6]  R. Szaro.  Southwestern riparian plant communities: site characteristics, tree species distributions and size-class structures. , 1990 .

[7]  H. Shugart,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION OF BREEDING BIRDS IN AN EAST TENNESSEE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1974 .

[8]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[9]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[10]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Point pattern analysis , 1985 .

[11]  D. E. Busch,et al.  Mechanisms Associated With Decline of Woody Species in Riparian Ecosystems of the Southwestern U.S. , 1995 .

[12]  A. J. Belsky,et al.  SURVEY OF LIVESTOCK INFLUENCES ON STREAM AND RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES , 1999 .

[13]  G. Walsberg.  Nest-Site Selection and the Radiative Environment of the Warbling Vireo , 1981 .

[14]  T. Avery,et al.  Fundamentals of Remote Sensing and Airphoto Interpretation , 1992 .

[15]  Y. Chou,et al.  Neighborhood effects in bird distributions, Navarre, Spain , 1996, Environmental management.

[16]  B. V. Horne,et al.  DENSITY AS A MISLEADING INDICATOR OF HABITAT QUALITY , 1983 .

[17]  S. Aronoff.  Geographic Information Systems: A Management Perspective , 1989 .

[18]  Jorge M. Palmeirim,et al.  Automatic Mapping of Avian Species Habitat Using Satellite Imagery , 1988 .

[19]  L. W. Gysel,et al.  Avian Nest Dispersion and Fledging Success in Field‐Forest Ecotones , 1978 .

[20]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[21]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[22]  Gregor T. Auble,et al.  Relating Riparian Vegetation to Present and Future Streamflows , 1994 .

[23]  Yue-Hong Chou,et al.  Exploring spatial analysis in geographic information systems , 1997 .

[24]  J. Schieck,et al.  CLUTCH PREDATION, COVER, AND THE OVERDISPERSION OF NESTS OF THE WILLOW PTARMIGAN' , 1993 .

[25]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[26]  K. J. Gutzwiller,et al.  Multiscale Associations between Cavity-Nesting Birds and Features of Wyoming Streamside Woodlands , 1987 .

[27]  John F. Lehmkuhl,et al.  Determining size and dispersion of minimum viable populations for land management planning and species conservation , 1984 .

[28]  Describing willow flycatcher habitats : scale perspectives and gender differences , 1992 .

[29]  J. G. Lyon.  Landsat-derived land-cover classifications for locating potential Kestrel nesting habitat , 1983 .

[30]  Gregor T. Auble,et al.  Fluvial process and the establishment of bottomland trees , 1996 .

[31]  W. Graf.  Tamarisk and river-channel management , 1982 .

[32]  R. Steidl,et al.  NESTING HABITAT AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF SOUTHWESTERN RIPARIAN BIRDS , 2000 .

[33]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[34]  William J. Ripple,et al.  Old-growth and mature forests near spotted owl nests in western Oregon , 1991 .

[35]  J. Roper,et al.  Nest Predation and Nest-Site Selection of a Western Population of the Hermit Thrush , 1988 .

[36]  R. Clark,et al.  AVIAN HABITAT SELECTION: PATTERN FROM PROCESS IN NEST-SITE USE BY DUCKS? , 1999 .

[37]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .