An overview to structural seismic design optimisation frameworks

The application of the performance-based seismic design concept using alternative formulations is presented in this work. The formulations discussed, are implemented within an automated structural design framework using a metaheuristic optimisation algorithm. Such frameworks are able to accommodate any advanced - linear or nonlinear, static or dynamic - analysis procedure and thus replace, the conventional trial-and-error process. The formulations presented treat the seismic design problem in a deterministic or a probabilistic manner, with one or more objectives that represent the initial cost or the cost of future earthquake losses that may occur during the lifetime of a structural system. Furthermore, the implementations discussed are all consistent with the performance-based design concept and take into consideration the structural response at a number of limit-states, from serviceability to collapse.

[1]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures , 1997 .

[2]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[3]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[4]  Tae Hee Lee,et al.  Robust Design: An Overview , 2006 .

[5]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  MODELING, ANALYSIS AND RELIABILITY OF SEISMICALLY EXCITED STRUCTURES: COMPUTATIONAL ISSUES , 2008 .

[6]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[7]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Building design based on energy dissipation: a critical assessment , 2010 .

[8]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Performance-based optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete structures , 2008 .

[9]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[10]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  PROS AND CONS OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1998 .

[11]  Nikos D. Lagaros,et al.  Assessment of seismic design procedures based on the total cost , 2006 .

[12]  Min Liu,et al.  Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations , 2003 .

[13]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Socioeconomic Implications of Life Quality Index in Design of Optimum Structures to Withstand Earthquakes , 2004 .

[14]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[15]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Minimum Building Life-Cycle Cost Design Criteria. II: Applications , 2001 .

[16]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[18]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[19]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost , 2006 .