XMM Spectroscopy of the Transient Supersoft Source RX J0513.9-6951: probing the dynamic white dwarf photosphere

The highly luminous (>1037 erg s?1) supersoft X-ray sources (SSSs) are believed to be Eddington-limited accreting white dwarfs undergoing surface hydrogen burning. The current paradigm for SSSs involves thermally unstable mass transfer from a 1–2M companion. However, this model has never been directly confirmed and yet is crucial for the evolution of cataclysmic variables (CVs) in general, and for the establishment of SSSs as progenitors of Type Ia supernovae in particular. The key SSS is RX J0513.9?6951 which has recurrent X-ray outbursts every 100–200 d (lasting for ?40 d) during which the optical brightness declines by 1 mag.We present the firstXMM observations of RX J0513.9?6951 through one of its optical low states. Our results show that as the optical low state progresses, the temperature and X-ray luminosity decrease, behaviour that is anti-correlated with the optical and ultraviolet (UV) emission. We find that as the optical (and UV) intensity recovers, the radius implied by the spectral fits increases. The high-resolution spectra show evidence of deep-absorption features which vary during the optical low state. Our results are consistent with the predictions of the white dwarf photospheric contraction model proposed by Southwell et al.

[1]  R. Sunyaev,et al.  The Milky Way in X-rays for an outside observer , 2001, astro-ph/0109239.

[2]  E.P.J. van den Heuvel,et al.  Compact stars in binaries , 1996 .

[3]  K. Korista,et al.  On the Column Density of AGN Outflows: The Case of NGC 5548 , 2001, astro-ph/0107472.

[4]  D. Crampton,et al.  A New Orbital Ephemeris and Reinterpretation of Spectroscopic Data for the Supersoft X-Ray Binary RX J0513.9−6951 , 2002, astro-ph/0207643.

[5]  R. McCray,et al.  X-ray nebular models , 1982 .

[6]  M. Page,et al.  The nature and origin of Seyfert warm absorbers , 2004, astro-ph/0411297.

[7]  J. Herder,et al.  The Reflection Grating Spectrometer on-board XMM-Newton: Status of the Calibrations , 2002 .

[8]  R. Honeycutt,et al.  Characteristics of High-State/Low-State Transitions in VY Sculptoris Stars , 2004 .

[9]  H. Ögelman,et al.  Detection of supersoft X-ray emission from GQ Muscae nine years after a nova outburst , 1993, Nature.

[10]  K. Nomoto.  Accreting white dwarf models for type I supernovae. I. Presupernova evolution and triggering mechanisms , 1981 .

[11]  J. Greiner.  Catalog of luminous supersoft X-ray sources , 1996 .

[12]  Robert A. Shaw,et al.  Astronomical data analysis software and systems IV : meeting held at Baltimore, Maryland, 25-28 September 1994 , 1995 .

[13]  D. Crampton,et al.  Detection, identification, and observed properties of Large Magellanic Cloud supersoft X-ray sources , 1993 .

[14]  K. Mukai,et al.  CAL 83: a 1-day period low-mass X-ray binary in the LMC , 1988 .

[15]  R. Hide.  Cosmical magnetic fields , 1978, Nature.

[16]  A. C. Brinkman,et al.  A high resolution spectroscopic observation of CAL 83 with XMM-Newton/RGS , 2000, astro-ph/0011038.

[17]  Bennett,et al.  Experimental limits on the dark matter halo of the galaxy from gravitational microlensing. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[18]  M. Livio,et al.  The X-ray off-state of the supersoft source CAL 83 and its interpretation , 1997 .

[19]  Elmar Pfeffermann,et al.  The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera , 2001 .

[20]  Los Alamos National Lab,et al.  The XMM-Newton optical/UV monitor telescope , 2000, astro-ph/0011216.

[21]  M. Livio,et al.  The Nature of the Supersoft X-Ray Source RX J0513-69 , 1996, astro-ph/9605090.

[22]  D. J. Helfand,et al.  A soft X-ray study of the Large Magellanic Cloud , 1981 .

[23]  J. E. Pringle,et al.  Precessing Jets in Supersoft X-Ray Sources , 1997 .

[24]  Walter H. G. Lewin,et al.  X-ray binaries. , 1976 .

[25]  Type Ia Supernovae and Supersoft X-Ray Sources , 1996 .

[26]  I. Hachisu,et al.  A New Clue to the Transition Mechanism between Optical High and Low States of the Supersoft X-Ray Source RX J0513.9–6951, Implied By the Recurrent Nova CI Aquilae 2000 Outburst Model , 2003, astro-ph/0301489.

[27]  D. Prialnik,et al.  An extended grid of multicycle nova evolution models , 1995 .

[28]  Cambridge,et al.  Black hole winds , 2003 .

[29]  Bohdan Paczynski,et al.  Evolutionary Processes in Close Binary Systems , 1971 .

[30]  R. Mohapatra,et al.  Structures in the Mirror Universe , 1996, astro-ph/9603049.

[31]  M. J. Page,et al.  The origin of the Fe K features in Markarian 205 and Markarian 509 , 2003 .

[32]  I. Hachisu,et al.  RX J0513.9–6951: The First Example of Accretion Wind Evolution, a Key Evolutionary Process to Type Ia Supernovae , 2003, astro-ph/0302485.

[33]  I. Iben.  Hot accreting white dwarfs in the quasi-static approximation , 1982 .

[34]  E. Salpeter,et al.  The interaction of X-ray sources with optically thin environments. , 1969 .

[35]  P. Callanan,et al.  Discovery of the 10.6 hr orbital period of CAL87: an eclipsing low-mass X-ray binary in the Large Magellanic Cloud , 1989 .

[36]  N. Grevesse,et al.  Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar , 1989 .

[37]  Andrew P. Rasmussen,et al.  Non-LTE Model Atmosphere Analysis of the Large Magellanic Cloud Supersoft X-Ray Source CAL 83 , 2004, astro-ph/0410093.

[38]  D. Prialnik,et al.  Accretion onto a 1.4 solar mass white dwarf: Classical nova, recurrent nova, or supernova? , 1994 .