Perceptions of government knowledge and control over contributions of aid organizations and INGOs to health in Nepal: a qualitative study

BackgroundAlmost 50% of the Nepali health budget is made up of international aid. International Non-Governmental Organizations working in the field of health are able to channel their funds directly to grass root level. During a 2010 conference, the Secretary of Population stated that the government has full knowledge and control over all funds and projects coming to Nepal. However, there are no documents to support this. The study aims to assess government and partner perceptions on whether Government of Nepal currently has full knowledge of contributions of international aid organizations and International Non-Governmental Organizations to health in Nepal and to assess if the government is able to control all foreign contributions to fit the objectives of Second Long Term Health Plan (1997–2017).MethodsA qualitative study was performed along with available literature review. Judgmental and snowball sampling led to 26 in depth interviews with key informants from the government, External Development Partners and International Non-Governmental Organizations. Results were triangulated based on source of data. Representatives of the Department of Health Services declined to be interviewed. Data collection was done until researchers felt data saturation had been reached with each group of key informants.ResultsWhile Ministry of Health and Population leads the sector wide approach that aims to integrate all donor and International Non-Governmental Organization contributions to health and direct them to the government’s priority areas, questions were raised around its capacity to do so. Similarly, informants questioned the extent to which Social Welfare Council was able to control all International Non-Governmental Organizations contributions. Political tumult, corruption in the government, lack of human resources in the government, lack of coordination between government bodies, convoluted bureaucracy, and unreliability of donor and International Non-Governmental Organization contributions were identified as the main reasons for difficulties in aid integration.ConclusionsDespite its commitment to coordinate and control development assistance to the health sector, and its leadership position of the Sector Wide Approach, complete knowledge and effective coordination of all international contributions remains a challenge and is hampered by issues within the government as well as among External Development Partners and International Non-Governmental Organizations.

[1]  L. Gilson,et al.  Health sector development: from aid coordination to resource management. , 1999, Health policy and planning.

[2]  E. Doheny.  United States Agency for International Development , 2011 .

[3]  R. Atun,et al.  A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems. , 2010, Health policy and planning.

[4]  I. B. Shrestha,et al.  System-wide effects of Global Fund investments in Nepal. , 2010, Health policy and planning.

[5]  M. Cueto,et al.  The origins of primary health care and selective primary health care. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[6]  A. Mills,et al.  A review of health resource tracking in developing countries. , 2007, Health policy and planning.

[7]  H. Ojha,et al.  Foreign Aid and Public Policy Process in Nepal A Case of Forestry and Local Governance , 2012 .

[8]  A. Montegut.  To Achieve “Health for All” We Must Shift the World's Paradigm to “Primary Care Access for All” , 2007, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[9]  C. Binns,et al.  Health for All , 2015, Asia-Pacific journal of public health.

[10]  Olaf Zimmermann,et al.  The Development Perspective , 2003 .

[11]  Robert M. Deiters.  Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). , 1968 .

[12]  J. Shiffman.  HIV/AIDS and the rest of the global health agenda. , 2006, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[13]  G. Martin.  Globalization and Health , 2005 .

[14]  J. Tickner.  Gender in international relations , 1992 .

[15]  R. Dodd,et al.  Where did all the aid go? An in-depth analysis of increased health aid flows over the past 10 years. , 2009, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[16]  N. Sewankambo,et al.  Strengthening primary care: addressing the disparity between vertical and horizontal investment. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  M. Tanner,et al.  The sector-wide approach: a blessing for public health? , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[18]  A. Cassels,et al.  Sectoral investment in health: prescription or principles? , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[19]  S. Sharma.  Politics and corruption mar health care in Nepal , 2010, The Lancet.

[20]  J. Shiffman,et al.  Generating political priority for maternal mortality reduction in 5 developing countries. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[21]  Denise Vaillancourt.  Do health sector-wide approaches achieve results? , 2009 .

[22]  Call for global health-systems impact assessments , 2009, The Lancet.

[23]  P. Hill,et al.  Programme alignment in higher-level planning processes: a four-country case-study for Sexual and Reproductive Health. , 2009, The International journal of health planning and management.