The age context of performance-evaluation decisions.

Organizational demography contends that demographic characteristics of individuals, examined at individual, dyadic, group, and organizational levels of analysis, exert significant effects on organizational processes. The purpose of this article was to test the contextual effects created by the interaction of work-group age composition and supervisor age on supervisor evaluations of subordinate performance. Two competing models of age demography were tested. The similarity model predicts that supervisors similar in age to the work group they supervise will issue generally higher performance ratings. The dissimilarity model, developed in this article, predicts the opposite. Support was indicated for the dissimilarity model. Implications of the results are discussed.

[1]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[2]  Susan R. Rhodes.  Age-Related Differences in Work Attitudes and Behavior: A Review and Conceptual Analysis , 1983 .

[3]  P. Villanova,et al.  Impression management in the context of performance appraisal. , 1989 .

[4]  Jeanette N. Cleveland,et al.  The Influence of Rater and Ratee Age on Two Performance Judgments. , 1981 .

[5]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal , 1987 .

[6]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  The effects of the social context on performance evaluations , 1982 .

[7]  J. N. Cleveland,et al.  Applicant pool composition and job perceptions: Impact on decisions regarding an older applicant , 1988 .

[8]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SUBORDINATE AGE ON PERFORMANCE RATINGS AND CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS , 1985 .

[9]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[10]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Theoretical and methodological considerations in the age-job satisfaction relationship , 1989 .

[11]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool , 1980 .

[12]  C. L. Gruder,et al.  The Endurance of Change Induced by a Reward and a Coercive Power Figure , 1967 .

[13]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  New Wrinkles in The Theory of Age: Demography, Norms, and Performance Ratings , 1988 .

[14]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[15]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[16]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. , 1983 .

[17]  Roy J. Lewicki,et al.  A Three‐Factor Experimental Analysis of Promises and Threats , 1973 .

[18]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[19]  E. Fodor.  Simulated Work Climate as an Influence on Choice of Leadership Style , 1978 .

[20]  Robert A. Giacalone,et al.  Impression management in the organization. , 1989 .

[21]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[22]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Hospital Demography and Turnover Among Nurses , 1987 .

[23]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[24]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of job experience on supervisor attributions for a subordinate's poor performance. , 1982 .

[25]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  The extra credit effect in interpersonal attraction , 1978 .

[26]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[27]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[28]  J. Tanur,et al.  . . . And some men have leadership thrust upon them. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.