Elementary School Students' Logical Reasoning on Rolling

This paper reports a study of students' logical reasoning on rolling. Student learning experiences consist of both physical actions and logico-mathematical reasoning, and this study examined the relations between the above two in the context of rolling. This study took place in a Grade 3 classroom in eastern Canada consisting of 16 students over a two month period. The focal research questions were: (a) What characteristics of rollers do elementary students perceive as the result of a series of activities on rolling? (b) What relations between the above characteristics do elementary students develop as the result of a series of activities on rolling? and (c) What conceptions of rollers do elementary students develop as the result of a series of activities on rolling? Data were collected through video- and audio-taping students' verbal interactions during activities, collecting students' in-class activity recording sheets and after-class learning journals, and interviewing representative students on their perceptions of rollers. It was found that, as the result of a series of physical activities on rolling, students were able to perceive not only internal characteristics of rollers such as mass, shape, and material, but also external characteristics of rollers such as the slope and surface of ramp. Students were also able to develop various relations between the above characteristics such as the higher the slope is the farther an object rolls. Students also developed various elaborations of rollers. The results demonstrated that students developed various levels of logical reasoning during activities on rolling. These results imply that during open-ended physical activities elementary school students develop their physical and conceptual understanding simultaneously.

[1]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Authentic school science : knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories , 1995 .

[2]  Jean Piaget Piaget’s Theory , 1976 .

[3]  J. Novak Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[4]  J. Piaget The Psychology Of Intelligence , 1951 .

[5]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[6]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[7]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics , 1996 .

[8]  L. Schauble,et al.  Reasoning about Structure and Function: Children's Conceptions of Gears , 1998 .

[9]  J. Hierrezuelo,et al.  Sliding and rolling: the physics of a rolling ball , 1995 .

[10]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Networking: The Technique and the Empirical Evidence , 1984 .

[11]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Possibility and Necessity , 1987 .

[12]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .

[13]  J. Bruner The Culture of Education , 1996 .

[14]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[15]  Kathleen E. Metz Development of explanation: Incremental and fundamental change in children's physics knowledge , 1991 .

[16]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[17]  Brenda J. Gustafson,et al.  Elementary Children's Technological Problem Solving: selecting an initial course of action , 1998 .

[18]  J. Novak,et al.  A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning , 1991 .

[19]  Karen F. Zuga An Analysis of Technology Education in the United States Based Upon an Historical Overview and Review of Contemporary Curriculum Research , 1997 .

[20]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Practice of constructivism in science education , 1993 .

[21]  Development of Children's Ideas on Motion: Impetus, the Straight‐down Belief and the Law of Support , 1993 .

[22]  Nancy J. Fellows A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning , 1994 .

[23]  Ralph Levinson,et al.  Science and Technology Concepts in a Design and Technology Project: a pilot study , 1997 .

[24]  Robin Millar,et al.  Alternative frameworks or context-specific reasoning? Children's ideas about the motion of projectiles , 1994 .

[25]  J. Mintzes,et al.  The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology , 1990 .

[26]  Reg Fleming,et al.  Literacy for a technological age , 1989 .