Recalibration of Phonetic Categories by Lipread Speech: Measuring Aftereffects After a 24-hour Delay

Listeners hearing an ambiguous speech sound flexibly adjust their phonetic categories in accordance with lipread information telling what the phoneme should be (recalibration). Here, we tested the stability of lipread-induced recalibration over time. Listeners were exposed to an ambiguous sound halfway between /t/ and /p/ that was dubbed onto a face articulating either /t/ or /p/. When tested immediately, listeners exposed to lipread /t/ were more likely to categorize the ambiguous sound as /t/ than listeners exposed to /p/. This aftereffect dissipated quickly with prolonged testing and did not reappear after a 24-hour delay. Recalibration of phonetic categories is thus a fragile phenomenon.

[1]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .

[2]  A. Samuel,et al.  Generalization in perceptual learning for speech , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L) , 2006 .

[4]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Visual Recalibration of Auditory Speech Identification , 2003, Psychological science.

[5]  Béatrice de Gelder,et al.  Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: Dissipation , 2004, AVSP.

[6]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Samuel.  Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory–visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Lawrence Brancazio,et al.  Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers , 2007 .

[13]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[14]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Jean Vroomen,et al.  Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Audiovisual speech recalibration in children* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  W. Ganong.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Jyrki Tuomainen,et al.  Lexical effects on auditory speech perception: An electrophysiological study , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.