Small and Medium Enterprise Research in Supply Chain Management: The Case for Single‐Respondent Research Designs

Deciding on the number of respondents in a data†collection instrument is a key design consideration requiring supply chain researchers to balance multiple competing factors. The debate on this respondent design question may unintentionally disregard over 95% of enterprises engaged in supply chains: small and medium enterprises (SMEs). We present arguments for why single†respondent designs can be more appropriate in the SME setting, particularly when considering the various facets of supply chain management and the untapped potential of SCM†SME research. Assuring that SCM theoretical frameworks and research designs allow for SME inclusion will be important in aiding the SCM field to progress forward.

[1]  T. Habbershon,et al.  A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms , 1999 .

[2]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Nonfamily Managers, Family Firms, and the Winner's Curse: The Influence of Noneconomic Goals and Bounded Rationality , 2014 .

[3]  Chee Yew Wong,et al.  The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance , 2011 .

[4]  M. Carney.  Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family–Controlled Firms , 2005 .

[5]  George A. Shinkle,et al.  Organizational Aspirations, Reference Points, and Goals , 2012 .

[6]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence , 2001 .

[7]  J. Kotlar,et al.  Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research , 2017 .

[8]  T. V. D. Vaart,et al.  A case of shared resources, uncertainty and supply chain integration in the process industry , 2005 .

[9]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[10]  Robert Lorin Cook,et al.  Subscription Supply Chains: The Ultimate Collaborative Paradigm , 2002 .

[11]  William S. Schulze,et al.  Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion Among The Directors of Private Family Firms , 2003 .

[12]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  The Determinants of Executive Compensation in Family-Controlled Public Corporations , 2003 .

[13]  Danny Miller,et al.  Family Firm Governance, Strategic Conformity, and Performance: Institutional vs. Strategic Perspectives , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Hui-Ming Wee,et al.  Supply Chain Performance Based on the Lean–Agile Operations and Supplier–Firm Partnership: An Empirical Study on the Garment Industry in Indonesia , 2013 .

[15]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills , 2007 .

[16]  K. Blois,et al.  Vertical Quasi-Integration , 1972 .

[17]  Julio O. De Castro,et al.  The Bind that Ties: Socioemotional Wealth Preservation in Family Firms , 2011 .

[18]  Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen.  The many and the few: rounding up the SMEs that manage CSR in the supply chain , 2009 .

[19]  Hans-Henrik Hvolby,et al.  Supply chain planning opportunities for small and medium sized companies , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[20]  L. Steier,et al.  Family Firms, Plural Forms of Governance, and the Evolving Role of Trust , 2001 .

[21]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  *The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms , 2007 .

[22]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[23]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[24]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms , 2005 .

[25]  Chi‐Nien Chung,et al.  Keeping it all in the Family: The Role of Particularistic Relationships in Business Group Performance during Institutional Transition , 2005 .

[26]  V. Grover,et al.  An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory , 1998 .

[27]  Alfredo De Massis,et al.  Conflicting Selves: Family Owners' Multiple Goals and Self-Control Agency Problems in Private Firms , 2018 .

[28]  Oliver Schilke,et al.  What Drives Key Informant Accuracy? , 2012 .

[29]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  The interplay between theory and method , 2007 .

[30]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  RIGOR VERSUS RELEVANCE: WHY WOULD WE CHOOSE ONLY ONE?* , 2008 .

[31]  A. Weele,et al.  The Future of Purchasing and Supply Management Research: About Relevance and Rigor , 2014 .

[32]  Robert S. Nason,et al.  Why Do Family Firms Strive for Nonfinancial Goals? An Organizational Identity Perspective , 2013 .

[33]  Josip Kotlar,et al.  Goal Setting in Family Firms: Goal Diversity, Social Interactions, and Collective Commitment to Family–Centered Goals , 2013 .

[34]  Joseph P. Morrissey,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of self-reported data in interorganizational networks , 1993 .

[35]  J. Meredith,et al.  Alternative research paradigms in operations , 1989 .

[36]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Toward a Theory of Familiness: A Social Capital Perspective , 2008 .

[37]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms , 2012 .

[38]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Corporate Ownership Around the World , 1998 .

[39]  G. George.  Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms , 2005 .

[40]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[41]  Judith M. Whipple,et al.  The Effect of Single Rater Bias in Multi‐Stakeholder Research: A Methodological Evaluation of Buyer‐Supplier Relationships , 2013 .

[42]  Robert S. Nason,et al.  A Stakeholder Perspective on Family Firm Performance , 2008 .

[43]  M. Christopher,et al.  Developing Market Specific Supply Chain Strategies , 2002 .

[44]  Nigel Slack,et al.  What happens when the supply chain manages you , 1998 .

[45]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives , 2012 .

[46]  Richard J. Arend,et al.  Small business and supply chain management: is there a fit? , 2005 .

[47]  M. Terziovski.  Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view , 2010 .

[48]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[49]  Tobias Schoenherr,et al.  Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions , 2012 .

[50]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Perceptions of Benevolence and the Design of Agency Contracts: CEO-TMT Relationships in Family Firms , 2010 .

[51]  James A. Narus,et al.  A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships , 1990 .

[52]  C. Harland,et al.  Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of eLands , 2007 .

[53]  P. Larson,et al.  What is SCM? And, Where is It? , 2002 .

[54]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[55]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[56]  I. Chen,et al.  Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements , 2004 .

[57]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Toward the Theory of the Supply Chain , 2015 .

[58]  Douglas W. Lyon,et al.  Enhancing Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Operationalizing and Measuring a Key Strategic Decision Making Process , 2000 .

[59]  Sergio G. Lazzarini,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Relationships in Developing Economies: Implications for SMEs' Access to Global Markets , 2008 .

[60]  A. Verbeke,et al.  The Transaction Cost Economics Theory of the Family Firm: Family–Based Human Asset Specificity and the Bifurcation Bias , 2012 .

[61]  S. Koh,et al.  A casual analysis of the impact of information systems and supply chain management practices on operational performance : evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Turkey , 2009 .

[62]  Barbara B. Flynn.  HAVING IT ALL: RIGOR VERSUS RELEVANCE IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH* , 2008 .

[63]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[64]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms , 2012 .

[65]  Daniel T. Holt,et al.  Variance in Family Members’ Assessments , 2017 .

[66]  William R. King,et al.  An assessment of perceptual differences between informants in information systems research , 1997 .

[67]  Eric Gedajlovic,et al.  Markets, Hierarchies, and Families: Toward a Transaction Cost Theory of the Family Firm , 2010 .

[68]  J. Kotlar,et al.  Financial Wealth, Socioemotional Wealth, and IPO Underpricing in Family Firms: A Two-stage Gamble Model , 2017, Academy of Management Journal.

[69]  Selim Zaim,et al.  The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[70]  R. Langlois.  The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .