The Effect of Radiation on Pedicled TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction: Outcomes and Implications

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of postreconstruction radiation therapy on patients undergoing pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Post-TRAM radiation patients were compared with patients who received pre-TRAM radiation and a control TRAM-only group who received no radiation. Overall aesthetic appearance, evidence of symmetry, flap contracture, and hyperpigmentation were assessed by blinded reviewers. A total of 171 pedicled TRAM reconstructions were performed in 150 patients. Total flap complications were seen in 49.5 percent of the control patients, 57.1 percent of pre-TRAM radiation patients, and 50 percent of post-TRAM radiation patients but were not statistically different. The complete flap necrosis rate was 0.6 percent and the partial flap necrosis rate was 7.6 percent, again with no statistical differences among the groups. Donor-site complications occurred in approximately one third of patients in each of the groups. Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus each occurred once and only in the post-TRAM radiation group. In terms of overall aesthetic outcome, symmetry, and contracture, the control group consistently rated better than the pre-TRAM (p = 0.021, p = 0.03, p = 0.03, respectively) and the post-TRAM (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, and p =0.0001, respectively) radiation groups. The control group also had clinically and statistically significant less hyperpigmentation than the post-TRAM radiation group (p = 0.0002). In contrast, irradiated postreconstruction patients had scores, including aesthetic outcome, symmetry, and contracture, worse than those of irradiated prereconstruction patients. When these two groups were compared with each other, except for contracture, no statistical significance, because of a small patient sample, was found. Neither preoperative nor postoperative radiation increased the risk for flap or donor-site complications. In contrast, radiation of any type did affect aesthetic appearance, symmetry, contracture, and hyperpigmentation. The authors recommend that TRAM flap breast reconstruction be postponed in those patients known or expected to receive postmastectomy radiation.

[1]  S. Singletary,et al.  Feasibility of postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  S. Edge,et al.  Outcome with Postmastectomy Radiation with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction , 2002, The American surgeon.

[3]  S. Edge,et al.  Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  G. Robb,et al.  Postoperative Adjuvant Irradiation: Effects on Tranverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap Breast Reconstruction , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Radiation tolerance of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous-free flaps used in immediate breast reconstruction. , 1998, American journal of clinical oncology.

[6]  K. Paige,et al.  A Comparison of Morbidity from Bilateral, Unipedicled and Unilateral, Unipedicled TRAM Flap Breast Reconstructions , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  G. Carlson,et al.  The Effects of Radiation Treatment after TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  F. Parsa Breast reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps in previously irradiated patients. , 1996, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  G. I. Taylor,et al.  TRAM Flap Anatomy Correlated with a 10‐Year Clinical Experience with 556 Patients , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  J. K. Williams,et al.  TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction After Radiation Treatment , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[11]  M. Scheflan,et al.  Breast Reconstruction with a Transverse Abdominal Island Flap , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.