Predicting resting-state functional connectivity with efficient structural connectivity

The complex relationship between structural connectivity ( SC ) and functional connectivity ( FC ) of human brain networks is still a critical problem in neuroscience. In order to investigate the role of SC in shaping resting-state FC, numerous models have been proposed. Here, we use a simple dynamic model based on the susceptible-infected-susceptible ( SIS ) model along the shortest paths to predict FC from SC. Unlike the previous dynamic model based on SIS theory, we focus on the shortest paths as the principal routes to transmit signals rather than the empirical structural brain network. We first simplify the structurally connected network into an efficient propagation network according to the shortest paths and then combine SIS infection theory with the efficient network to simulate the dynamic process of human brain activity. Finally, we perform an extensive comparison study between the dynamic models embedded in the efficient network, the dynamic model embedded in the structurally connected network and dynamic mean field ( DMF ) model predicting FC from SC. Extensive experiments on two different resolution datasets indicate that i: the dynamic model simulated on the shortest paths can predict FC among both structurally connected and unconnected node pairs; ii: though there are fewer links in the efficient propagation network, the predictive power of FC derived from the efficient propagation network is better than the dynamic model simulated on a structural brain network; iii: 9 in comparison with the DMF model, the dynamic model embedded in the shortest paths is found to perform better to predict FC.

[1]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Naotaka Fujii,et al.  From neuron to behavior: Evidence from behavioral measurements , 2012, Neurocomputing.

[3]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  M. Greicius,et al.  Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, Brain Structure and Function.

[6]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  H. Voss,et al.  Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  C. J. Honeya,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009 .

[9]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Exploring the Morphospace of Communication Efficiency in Complex Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  David G. Norris,et al.  An Investigation of Functional and Anatomical Connectivity Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  Jaewook Joo,et al.  Behavior of susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemics on heterogeneous networks with saturation. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Guoping Jiang,et al.  Backward bifurcation and local dynamics of epidemic model on adaptive networks with treatment , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[13]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[14]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[15]  K Sneppen,et al.  Communication boundaries in networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[16]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Stefan Hougardy,et al.  The Floyd-Warshall algorithm on graphs with negative cycles , 2010, Inf. Process. Lett..

[18]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Kötter,et al.  Cortical network dynamics with time delays reveals functional connectivity in the resting brain , 2008, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[21]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Searchability of networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest , 2014, Progress in Neurobiology.

[23]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Identification of Optimal Structural Connectivity Using Functional Connectivity and Neural Modeling , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[27]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Altered resting state networks in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: An fMRI study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[29]  S. Bressler,et al.  Operational principles of neurocognitive networks. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Modeling the outcome of structural disconnection on resting-state functional connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  H. Stanley,et al.  Effect of the interconnected network structure on the epidemic threshold. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Claudio Castellano,et al.  Thresholds for epidemic spreading in networks , 2010, Physical review letters.

[37]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Model‐free group analysis shows altered BOLD FMRI networks in dementia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[39]  Damien Coyle,et al.  Model-based bifurcation and power spectral analyses of thalamocortical alpha rhythm slowing in Alzheimer's Disease , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[40]  D. Leopold,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Modelling the development of cortical systems networks , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[43]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Simple models of human brain functional networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Nature of the epidemic threshold for the susceptible-infected-susceptible dynamics in networks. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[45]  P Tewarie,et al.  The relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks. , 2016, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[46]  O. Sporns,et al.  Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  R. Kahn,et al.  Functionally linked resting‐state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain , 2009, Human brain mapping.