R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a Set of Metrics

In this article the results are presented of an empirical study focusing on the effectiveness of R&D performance measurement practices in the Netherlands. First, a theoretical examination of the subject ‘R&D performance measurement’ is given within the context of performance control. A distinction is made between feedback and feed forward control and between the R&D function and the R&D organisation. Subsequently, a description is given of the current practices of R&D performance measurement in terms of measurement purposes, metrics, measurement techniques, norms setting, etc. Furthermore, the influence of contingencies on measurement system design is explored. The data for this research were gathered by means of a survey and nine in‐depth interviews. Generally, managers evaluate their measurement systems as being quite valuable, having a positive impact on performance. The findings described in this paper can be used as references for managers to benchmark their R&D measurement procedures: in this respect we distinguish highly and hardly effective measurement procedures. The most important characteristic that seems to distinguish the most effective systems from the less effective ones is customer focus.

[1]  Michael Burda,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1993 .

[2]  Phil Francis,et al.  Putting Quality into the R&D Process , 1992 .

[3]  Lawrence H. Linden,et al.  Improving the Return on R&D—II , 1985 .

[4]  Paul A. Schumann,et al.  Measuring R&D Performance , 1995 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[6]  Richard Whittington.  Changing control strategies in industrial R&D , 1991 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[8]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Measuring development performance in the electronics industry , 1996 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[10]  Raynold A. Svenson,et al.  Measuring R&D Productivity , 1988 .

[11]  Y. Takeda,et al.  A managerial approach to research and development cost-effectiveness evaluation , 1990 .

[12]  P. Coughlan,et al.  Development of a technical innovation audit , 1996 .

[13]  M. Moser.  Measuring Performance in R&D Settings , 1985 .

[14]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[15]  E. Hultink,et al.  Measuring new product success: The difference that time perspective makes , 1995 .

[16]  W. Ouchi.  A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[17]  Andrew Cooke,et al.  Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes , 1997 .

[18]  Walter L. Robb.  How Good Is Our Research , 1991 .

[19]  A. Griffin.  PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[20]  K. Srinivasa Rao,et al.  Performance monitoring in R&D projects , 1996 .

[21]  John Dearden,et al.  Management control systems : cases and readings , 1965 .

[22]  T. M. Foster,et al.  Making R&D More Effective at Westinghouse , 1996 .

[23]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Metrics to evaluate R,D&E , 1997 .

[24]  Philip A. Roussel,et al.  Third generation R & D : managing the link to corporate strategy / Philip A. Roussel, Kamal N. Saad, Tamara J. Erickson , 1991 .

[25]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development , 1995 .

[26]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders-I , 1997 .

[27]  L. Soete,et al.  De technologische positie van de Nederlandse industrie , 1993 .