On-Ground Vineyard Reconstruction Using a LiDAR-Based Automated System

Crop 3D modeling allows site-specific management at different crop stages. In recent years, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors have been widely used for gathering information about plant architecture to extract biophysical parameters for decision-making programs. The study reconstructed vineyard crops using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology. Its accuracy and performance were assessed for vineyard crop characterization using distance measurements, aiming to obtain a 3D reconstruction. A LiDAR sensor was installed on-board a mobile platform equipped with an RTK-GNSS receiver for crop 2D scanning. The LiDAR system consisted of a 2D time-of-flight sensor, a gimbal connecting the device to the structure, and an RTK-GPS to record the sensor data position. The LiDAR sensor was facing downwards installed on-board an electric platform. It scans in planes perpendicular to the travel direction. Measurements of distance between the LiDAR and the vineyards had a high spatial resolution, providing high-density 3D point clouds. The 3D point cloud was obtained containing all the points where the laser beam impacted. The fusion of LiDAR impacts and the positions of each associated to the RTK-GPS allowed the creation of the 3D structure. Although point clouds were already filtered, discarding points out of the study area, the branch volume cannot be directly calculated, since it turns into a 3D solid cluster that encloses a volume. To obtain the 3D object surface, and therefore to be able to calculate the volume enclosed by this surface, a suitable alpha shape was generated as an outline that envelops the outer points of the point cloud. The 3D scenes were obtained during the winter season when only branches were present and defoliated. The models were used to extract information related to height and branch volume. These models might be used for automatic pruning or relating this parameter to evaluate the future yield at each location. The 3D map was correlated with ground truth, which was manually determined, pruning the remaining weight. The number of scans by LiDAR influenced the relationship with the actual biomass measurements and had a significant effect on the treatments. A positive linear fit was obtained for the comparison between actual dry biomass and LiDAR volume. The influence of individual treatments was of low significance. The results showed strong correlations with actual values of biomass and volume with R2 = 0.75, and when comparing LiDAR scans with weight, the R2 rose up to 0.85. The obtained values show that this LiDAR technique is also valid for branch reconstruction with great advantages over other types of non-contact ranging sensors, regarding a high sampling resolution and high sampling rates. Even narrow branches were properly detected, which demonstrates the accuracy of the system working on difficult scenarios such as defoliated crops.

[1]  David Reiser,et al.  3D Maize Plant Reconstruction Based on Georeferenced Overlapping LiDAR Point Clouds , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  A real-time phenotyping framework using machine learning for plant stress severity rating in soybean , 2017, Plant Methods.

[3]  S. Fountas,et al.  Precision Agriculture Technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics , 2017 .

[4]  David C. Slaughter,et al.  Optical Sensing to Determine Tomato Plant Spacing for Precise Agrochemical Application: Two Scenarios , 2017, Sensors.

[5]  Valeriano Méndez,et al.  LiDAR simulation in modelled orchards to optimise the use of terrestrial laser scanners and derived vegetative measures , 2013 .

[6]  Achim Walter,et al.  Opinion: Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Yi Lin,et al.  LiDAR: An important tool for next-generation phenotyping technology of high potential for plant phenomics? , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[8]  Javier Guevara,et al.  Mechatronic terrestrial LiDAR for canopy porosity and crown surface estimation , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[9]  Martin Weis,et al.  An Ultrasonic System for Weed Detection in Cereal Crops , 2012, Sensors.

[10]  W. Philips,et al.  Rosette Tracker: An Open Source Image Analysis Tool for Automatic Quantification of Genotype Effects1[C][W] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[11]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  High Throughput Determination of Plant Height, Ground Cover, and Above-Ground Biomass in Wheat with LiDAR , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[12]  José Dorado,et al.  Influence of Wind Speed on RGB-D Images in Tree Plantations , 2017, Sensors.

[13]  Michael A. Gore,et al.  Cotton phenotyping with lidar from a track-mounted platform , 2016, SPIE Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging.

[14]  R. Sanz,et al.  A review of methods and applications of the geometric characterization of tree crops in agricultural activities , 2012 .

[15]  Jordi Llop,et al.  Advanced Technologies for the Improvement of Spray Application Techniques in Spanish Viticulture: An Overview , 2014, Sensors.

[16]  Ze He,et al.  Estimating Leaf Area Density of Individual Trees Using the Point Cloud Segmentation of Terrestrial LiDAR Data and a Voxel-Based Model , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[17]  H. Dobson,et al.  Invited review: Learning from the future-A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  M. Zaman-Allah,et al.  Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[19]  V. Rueda-Ayala,et al.  A LiDAR-Based System to Assess Poplar Biomass , 2016, Gesunde Pflanzen.

[20]  José M. Bengochea-Guevara,et al.  Comparing UAV-Based Technologies and RGB-D Reconstruction Methods for Plant Height and Biomass Monitoring on Grass Ley , 2019, Sensors.

[21]  Angela Ribeiro,et al.  A Low-Cost Approach to Automatically Obtain Accurate 3D Models of Woody Crops , 2017, Sensors.

[22]  B. Bailey,et al.  Rapid measurement of the three-dimensional distribution of leaf orientation and the leaf angle probability density function using terrestrial LiDAR scanning , 2017 .

[23]  Miguel Garrido Izard,et al.  Evaluation of Over-The-Row Harvester Damage in a Super-High-Density Olive Orchard Using On-Board Sensing Techniques , 2018, Sensors.

[24]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Mapping Vineyard Leaf Area Using Mobile Terrestrial Laser Scanners: Should Rows be Scanned On-the-Go or Discontinuously Sampled? , 2016, Sensors.

[25]  José Dorado,et al.  Application note: Potential of a terrestrial LiDAR-based system to characterise weed vegetation in maize crops , 2013 .

[26]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1992, VVS.

[27]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  A Method to Obtain Orange Crop Geometry Information Using a Mobile Terrestrial Laser Scanner and 3D Modeling , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[28]  Seishi Ninomiya,et al.  On Plant Detection of Intact Tomato Fruits Using Image Analysis and Machine Learning Methods , 2014, Sensors.

[29]  A. Possolo,et al.  R Implementation of a Polyhedral Approximation to a 3D Set of Points Using the α-Shape , 2014 .