Neural Bases of Automaticity

Automaticity allows us to perform tasks in a fast, efficient, and effortless manner after sufficient practice. Theories of automaticity propose that across practice processing transitions from being controlled by working memory to being controlled by long-term memory retrieval. Recent event-related potential (ERP) studies have sought to test this prediction, however, these experiments did not use the canonical paradigms used to study automaticity. Specifically, automaticity is typically studied using practice regimes with consistent mapping between targets and distractors and spaced practice with individual targets, features that these previous studies lacked. The aim of the present work was to examine whether the practice-induced shift from working memory to long-term memory inferred from subjects’ ERPs is observed under the conditions in which automaticity is traditionally studied. We found that to be the case in 3 experiments, firmly supporting the predictions of theories. In addition, we found that the temporal distribution of practice (massed vs. spaced) modulates the shape of learning curves. The ERP data revealed that the switch to long-term memory is slower for spaced than massed practice, suggesting that memory systems are used in a strategic manner. This finding provides new constraints for theories of learning and automaticity.

[1]  Nick Berggren,et al.  Does Contralateral Delay Activity Reflect Working Memory Storage or the Current Focus of Spatial Attention within Visual Working Memory? , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Woodman,et al.  Attention’s Accelerator , 2016, Psychological science.

[3]  Edward Awh,et al.  The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  G. Woodman,et al.  Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  High stakes trigger the use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  D. Tsivilis,et al.  The electrophysiological correlates of recent and remote recollection , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? , 2013, Journal of vision.

[9]  Regine Bader,et al.  The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400 , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Response to Paller et al.: the role of familiarity in making inferences about unknown quantities , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Homologous Mechanisms of Visuospatial Working Memory Maintenance in Macaque and Human: Properties and Sources , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  G. Woodman.  A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Conceptual Priming and Familiarity: Different Expressions of Memory during Recognition Testing with Distinct Neurophysiological Correlates , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition , 2010, Brain Research.

[18]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[21]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Caren M Rotello,et al.  Analysis of RT distributions in the remember—know paradigm , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[26]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved , 2006, Brain Research.

[27]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Fluent Conceptual Processing and Explicit Memory for Faces Are Electrophysiologically Distinct , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  W. Schneider,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of practice-related change: fMRI and meta-analytic evidence of a domain-general control network for learning. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[32]  W..  The Situation with Respect to the Spacing of Repetitions and Memory , 2005 .

[33]  T. Curran.  Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  A. Friederici.  Event-related brain potential studies in language , 2004, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[35]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[36]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  A Meta-analysis of the Spacing Effect in Verbal Learning: Implications for Research on Advertising Repetition and Consumer Memory , 2003 .

[38]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[42]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[43]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  An instance theory of attention and memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[44]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[45]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  E. Wilding.  In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[48]  J. J. Donovan,et al.  A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. , 1999 .

[49]  Thomas J. Palmeri,et al.  Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice. , 1999 .

[50]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  The mix-up regarding mixed and unmixed lists in spacing-effect research , 1999 .

[51]  R. Johnson,et al.  A spatio-temporal analysis of recognition-related event-related brain potentials. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[52]  T. Rickard.  Bending the power law : A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills , 1997 .

[53]  T. Palmeri.  Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[56]  M. Conway,et al.  Pictures, images, and recollective experience. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect , 1993 .

[58]  G. Logan.  Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  J. Bargh.  The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[60]  A. Kramer,et al.  Task versus component consistency in the development of automatic processing: a psychophysiological assessment. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[61]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? , 1991 .

[62]  G. Logan.  Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[64]  R. Siegler.  The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[65]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[66]  W. Hockley.  Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. , 1984 .

[67]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Category and word search: generalizing search principles to complex processing. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[69]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Type of Task Practice and Time-Sharing Activities Predict Performance Deficits Due to Alcohol Ingestion , 1982 .

[70]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[71]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[72]  Kristine C. Bloom,et al.  Effects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary , 1981 .

[73]  E. Donchin,et al.  Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials , 1980, Brain Research.

[74]  G. Logan.  Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[76]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality , 1979 .

[77]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Attention in Character-Classification Tasks : Evidence for the Automaticity of Component Stages , 1978 .

[78]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[79]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[80]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1974 .

[81]  L. Standing.  Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[82]  R. Ley,et al.  Effects of spaced presentations of stimulus terms, response terms, and stimulus-response pairs on retention in paired-associate learning , 1972 .

[83]  T. SHALLICE,et al.  Learning and Memory , 1970, Nature.

[84]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[85]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[86]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[87]  B. Underwood.  Ten years of massed practice on distributed practice. , 1961 .

[88]  Jonathan W. Brown,et al.  Response latencies produced by massed and spaced learning of a paired-associates list , 1961 .

[89]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[90]  J. Mauchly.  Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal $n$-Variate Distribution , 1940 .

[91]  T. Ruch.  Factors influencing the relative economy of massed and distributed practice in learning. , 1928 .

[92]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[93]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .