Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa

Abstract The difficulty of choosing appropriate selection environments has restricted breeding progress for abiotic stress tolerance in highly variable target environments. Genotype-by-environment interactions in southern African maize growing environments result from factors related to maximum temperature, season rainfall, season length, within-season drought, subsoil pH and socio-economic factors that result in sub-optimal input application. In 1997, CIMMYT initiated a product-oriented breeding program targeted at improving maize for the drought-prone mid-altitudes of southern Africa. Maize varieties were selected in Zimbabwe using simultaneous selection in three types of environments, (i) recommended agronomic management/high rainfall conditions, (ii) low N stress, and (iii) managed drought. Between 2000 and 2002, 41 hybrids from this approach were compared with 42 released and pre-released hybrids produced by private seed companies in 36–65 trials across eastern and southern Africa. Average trial yields ranged from less than 1 t/ha to above 10 t/ha. Hybrids from CIMMYT's stress breeding program showed a consistent advantage over private company check hybrids at all yield levels. Selection differentials were largest between 2 and 5 t/ha and they became less significant at higher yield levels. An Eberhart–Russell stability analysis estimated a 40% yield advantage at the 1-t yield level which decreased to 2.5% at the 10-t yield level. We conclude that including selection under carefully managed high-priority abiotic stresses, including drought, in a breeding program and with adequate weighing can significantly increase maize yields in a highly variable drought-prone environment and particularly at lower yield levels.

[1]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement , 1996 .

[2]  Villaseñor Mir.  Outline of the wheat breeding program for rainfed areas in Mexico. , 2000 .

[3]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid , 1997 .

[4]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Efficiency of high-nitrogen selection environments for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments , 1997 .

[5]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Relationship between barley grain yield measured in low- and high-yielding environments , 2004, Euphytica.

[6]  J. Nyamangara,et al.  Soil Fertility Status in the Communal Areas of Zimbabwe in Relation to Sustainable Crop Production , 2000 .

[7]  A. Blum.  Genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants: a case for sorghum , 1979 .

[8]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize II. Grain yield, biomass production, and N accumulation , 1994 .

[9]  A. Rosielle,et al.  Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-Stress Environment 1 , 1981 .

[10]  B. Carver,et al.  Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments , 2004, Euphytica.

[11]  D. Cleveland,et al.  Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice , 2002 .

[12]  P. Byrne,et al.  Gains from Selection under Drought versus Multilocation Testing in Related Tropical Maize Populations , 1995 .

[13]  S. Johnson,et al.  Influence of water stress on grain yield response to recurrent selection in maize , 1989 .

[14]  W. A. Russell,et al.  Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties , 1966 .

[15]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Collaborative maize variety development for stress-prone environments in southern Africa. , 2002 .

[16]  V. Moda‐Cirino,et al.  Response of common bean cultivars and lines to water stress , 2001 .

[17]  S. Fukai,et al.  Screening for drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice , 1999 .

[18]  F. Baker.  Drought resistance in cereals , 1989 .

[19]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance , 2002 .

[20]  R. M. Castleberry,et al.  Genetic Yield Improvement of U.S. Maize Cultivars under Varying Fertility and Climatic Environments1 , 1984 .

[21]  Kaye E. Basford,et al.  Retrospective analysis of historical data sets from multi-environment trials - theoretical development. , 1996 .

[22]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Physiological Basis of the Genetic Improvement of Corn , 1994 .

[23]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Traditional approaches to breeding for drought resistance in cereals. , 1989 .

[24]  S. Fukai,et al.  Combining information from multi-environment trials and molecular markers to select adaptive traits for yield improvement of rice in water-limited environments , 1999 .

[25]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization , 1993 .

[26]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize I. Selection criteria , 1994 .

[27]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[28]  B. Kobiljski,et al.  Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivars and landraces under near optimal and drought conditions , 2000, Euphytica.

[29]  D. Taleghani,et al.  Genetic variation for drought stress in sugarbeet. , 2000 .

[30]  Marianne Bänziger,et al.  Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels , 1999 .

[31]  Kaye E. Basford,et al.  Computer simulation of a selection strategy to accommodate genotype environment interactions in a wheat recurrent selection programme , 1999 .

[32]  W. Link,et al.  Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Vicia faba , 1999 .

[33]  A. Hallauer,et al.  Mass Selection for Yield in Two Varieties of Maize 1 , 1969 .

[34]  G. Atlin,et al.  Selecting oat lines for yield in low-productivity environments , 1990 .

[35]  R. Staples,et al.  Stress Physiology in Crop Plants , 1980 .

[36]  W. A. Compton,et al.  Differential response of maize (Zea mays L.) to mass selection in diverse selection environments , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[37]  Marianne Bänziger,et al.  Breeding for low input conditions and consequences for participatory plant breeding examples from tropical maize and wheat , 2004, Euphytica.

[38]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Efficiency of Secondary Traits for Improving Maize for Low‐Nitrogen Target Environments , 1997 .

[39]  E. Jaycox.  Ending Hunger in Africa , 1988 .

[40]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior , 1993 .

[41]  D. Duvick,et al.  Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States , 1999 .

[42]  A. Rathjen,et al.  Choosing trial sites to maximize selection response for grain yield in spring wheat , 1981 .

[43]  A. Tarekegne,et al.  Characterization of maize germplasm grown in Eastern and Southern Africa: Results of the 2000 regional trials coordinated by CIMMYT , 2001 .

[44]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Selection of Barley Lines for Drought Tolerance in Low-Rainfall Areas , 2001 .

[45]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index , 1999 .

[46]  O. P. Yadav,et al.  Genetic variation in drought response of landraces of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] , 2003 .

[47]  G. Edmeades,et al.  The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize , 1996 .

[48]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize III. Variation in yield across environments , 1994 .