Evaluation of 10 Methods for Initializing a Land Surface Model

Abstract Improper initialization of numerical models can cause spurious trends in the output, inviting erroneous interpretations of the earth system processes that one wishes to study. In particular, soil moisture memory is considerable, so that accurate initialization of this variable in land surface models (LSMs) is critical. The most commonly employed method for initializing an LSM is to spin up by looping through a single year repeatedly until a predefined equilibrium is achieved. The downside to this technique, when applied to continental- to global-scale simulations, is that regional annual anomalies in the meteorological forcing accumulate as artificial anomalies in the land surface states, including soil moisture. Nine alternative approaches were tested and compared using the Mosaic LSM and 15 yr of global meteorological forcing. Results indicate that the most efficient way to initialize an LSM, if possible and given that multiple years of preceding forcing are not available, is to use climatologi...

[1]  Aaron A. Berg,et al.  Impact of bias correction to reanalysis products on simulations of North American soil moisture and hydrological fluxes , 2003 .

[2]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[3]  Ian Simmonds,et al.  The influence of pre‐existing soil moisture content on Australian winter climate , 1992 .

[4]  M. Kanamitsu,et al.  NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) , 2002 .

[5]  K. Mitchell,et al.  A parameterization of snowpack and frozen ground intended for NCEP weather and climate models , 1999 .

[6]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3 , 1993 .

[7]  A. Dalcher,et al.  A Simple Biosphere Model (SIB) for Use within General Circulation Models , 1986 .

[8]  R. Koster,et al.  Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands , 1992 .

[9]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS phase 2(d). , 2000 .

[10]  Paul R. Houser,et al.  A methodology for initializing soil moisture in a global climate model: Assimilation of near‐surface soil moisture observations , 2001 .

[11]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Land surface model spin‐up behavior in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) , 2003 .

[12]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[13]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology , 1989 .

[14]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Assessment of the Land Surface and Boundary Layer Models in Two Operational Versions of the NCEP Eta Model Using FIFE Data , 1997 .

[15]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Preliminary study of spin‐up processes in land surface models with the first stage data of Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes Phase 1(a) , 1995 .

[16]  A. J. Dolman,et al.  The Pilot Phase of the Global Soil Wetness Project , 1999 .

[17]  Y. Xue,et al.  Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations , 1996 .

[18]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  The influence of potential evaporation on the variabilities of simulated soil wetness and climate , 1988 .

[19]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .