Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information

The tendency of orders to increase in variability as one moves up a supply chain is commonly known as the bullwhip effect. We study this phenomenon from a behavioral perspective in the context of a simple, serial, supply chain subject to information lags and stochastic demand. We conduct two experiments on two different sets of participants. In the first, we find the bullwhip effect still exists when normal operational causes (e.g., batching, price fluctuations, demand estimation, etc.) are removed. The persistence of the bullwhip effect is explained to some extent by evidence that decision makers consistently underweight the supply line when making order decisions. In the second experiment, we find that the bullwhip, and the underlying tendency of underweighting, remains when information on inventory levels is shared. However, we observe that inventory information helps somewhat to alleviate the bullwhip effect by helping upstream chain members better anticipate and prepare for fluctuations in inventory needs downstream. These experimental results support the theoretically suggested notion that upstream chain members stand to gain the most from information-sharing initiatives.

[1]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains , 1999 .

[2]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies , 1999 .

[4]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.

[5]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance , 1999 .

[6]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  A Single-Item Inventory Model for a Nonstationary Demand Process , 1999, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[7]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[8]  M. Reiman,et al.  Echelon Reorder Points, Installation Reorder Points, and the Value of Centralized Demand Information , 1998 .

[9]  D. Simchi-Levi,et al.  The Bullwhip Effect: Managerial Insights on the Impact of Forecasting and Information on Variability in a Supply Chain , 1999 .

[10]  Herbert E. Scarf,et al.  Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem , 1960, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Andrew Schotter,et al.  Behavioral Consequences of Corporate Incentives and Long-Term Bonuses: An Experimental Study , 1992 .

[12]  Awi Federgruen,et al.  Computational Issues in an Infinite-Horizon, Multiechelon Inventory Model , 1984, Oper. Res..

[13]  J. Sterman,et al.  Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making , 1995 .

[14]  Fangruo Chen Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays , 1999 .

[15]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[16]  J. Sterman Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making , 1989 .

[17]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  Supply Chain Decision Making: Will Shorter Cycle Times and Shared Point-of-Sale Information Necessarily Help? , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence.: Experimental Evidence. , 2000 .

[19]  Mark Paich,et al.  Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets , 1993 .

[20]  L. LeeHau,et al.  Information Distortion in a Supply Chain , 1997 .

[21]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information , 2000 .

[22]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Exploiting timely demand information to reduce inventories , 1996 .

[23]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  A Modeling Framework for Coordinating Promotion and Production Decisions within a Firm , 1993 .

[24]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain , 2000 .

[26]  K. Sengupta,et al.  Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic decision environments: an experimental investigation , 1993 .

[27]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Learning in and about complex systems , 1994 .

[28]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Business Cycles and Productivity in Capital Equipment Supply Chains , 1999 .