Clinical Indicators of Surgical Outcomes After Laminoplasty for Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Study Design. A prospective multicenter study. Objective. This study aims to evaluate patient-reported outcomes using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) and clarify clinical factors that affect the therapeutic effects for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Summary of Background Data. Although previous studies identified factors that affected the surgical outcomes, their assessment was mainly based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, which only includes neurological function. Investigating this pathology through multiple functions and quality of life (QOL) is pivotal to understanding the comprehensive clinical pictures of the cervical OPLL and its therapeutic outcomes. Materials and Methods. This study was performed by the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament. A total of 478 patients with myelopathy caused by cervical OPLL from 28 institutions were prospectively registered from 2014 to 2017 and followed up for 2 years. Of the patients, 168 received laminoplasties and fully completed questionnaires. Demographic information, imaging findings, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were grouped according to effective or ineffective surgical outcomes as defined by the JOACMEQ using logistic regression analyses. Results. Laminoplasty resulted in functional improvement in the cervical spine and upper extremity around 40% of the patients, while QOL showed only 21.4% (P<0.01). Multivariable analyses revealed that younger age and a postoperative decrease in arm or hand pain were correlated with significantly improved function of the upper extremities. A reduction in lower limb pain favorably affected the postoperative lower extremity function. A postoperative reduction in upper extremity pain enhanced the QOL recovery. Conclusions. Surgeons should recognize the diversity of surgical outcomes after laminoplasty and understand the necessity of pain management even after the surgery to enhance bodily functions and QOL in patients with cervical OPLL.

[1]  H. Nakajima,et al.  Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament , 2021, Scientific reports.

[2]  Tetsuro Ohba,et al.  The impact of ossification spread on cervical spine function in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Tetsuro Ohba,et al.  Associations between Clinical Symptoms and Degree of Ossification in Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multi-Institutional Cross-Sectional Study , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  B. Aarabi,et al.  Recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional survey of an international, online community of patients , 2019, BMJ Open.

[5]  Osahiko Tsuji,et al.  Clinical indicators of surgical outcomes after cervical single open-door laminoplasty assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire , 2019, Spinal Cord.

[6]  W. Ding,et al.  Comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament , 2018, Medicine.

[7]  E. Mittra,et al.  Detection of nociceptive-related metabolic activity in the spinal cord of low back pain patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2017, Scandinavian journal of pain.

[8]  M. Matsumoto,et al.  Correlation between preoperative physical signs and functional outcomes after laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  Y. Yukawa,et al.  Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain control after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[10]  Toshihiko Sakakibara,et al.  Validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). , 2016, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[11]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Does age affect surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy? Results from the prospective multicenter AOSpine International study on 479 patients , 2015, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  W. Yuan,et al.  Clinical and Imaging Predictors of Surgical Outcome in Multilevel Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: An Analysis of 184 Patients , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  D. Lai,et al.  Responsiveness of the Chinese Versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index in Postoperative Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.

[14]  Soon-Young Kwon,et al.  Prognostic factors for surgical outcome in spinal cord injury associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[15]  Ali Montazeri,et al.  An Outcome Measure of Functionality and Quality of Life in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy , 2014, Iranian Red Crescent medical journal.

[16]  W. Ding,et al.  Using the T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestations to assess the prognosis of patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[17]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) The report on the development of revised versions April 16, 2007 , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[18]  H. Konishi,et al.  A New Concept for Making Decisions Regarding the Surgical Approach for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: The K-Line , 2008, Spine.

[19]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1 , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[20]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  Surgical Strategy for Cervical Myelopathy due to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Part 1: Clinical Results and Limitations of Laminoplasty , 2007, Spine.

[21]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Factors Affecting Prognosis of Patients Who Underwent Corpectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Analysis of 47 Patients , 2005, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[22]  Y. Kawaguchi,et al.  Minimum 10-Year Followup After En Bloc Cervical Laminoplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Progression of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Following en Bloc Cervical Laminoplasty , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  K. Shinomiya,et al.  Long-Term Results of the Anterior Floating Method for Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament , 2001, Spine.

[25]  N. Goto,et al.  Age-related reductions in number and size of anterior horn cells at C6 level of the human spinal cord. , 1996, Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica.

[26]  W. S. Chin,et al.  Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. , 1979, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  K. Yonenobu,et al.  The Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation , 2009 .

[28]  紺野愼一,et al.  日本整形外科学会腰痛評価質問票JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire(JOABPEQ)/日本整形外科学会頚部脊髄症評価質問票JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire(JOACMEQ)作成報告書(平成19年4月16日) , 2008 .

[29]  Gen Sobue,et al.  Age-related changes of the myelinated fibers in the human corticospinal tract: a quantitative analysis , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.