An analytical comparison of ultrasonic array imaging algorithms.

In the paper different techniques for post-processing data from an ultrasonic transducer array are considered. First, a mathematical model of the transmit-receive array data is developed. Then based on this model three imaging methods are formulated: the total focusing method, the wavenumber algorithm, and the back-propagation method. Although these methods are conceptually different and use different approximations they can all be expressed in the form of a linear superposition of transmit-receive signals in the frequency domain with some focusing coefficients. The equivalent coefficients for each processing algorithm are derived, and difference between approaches is discussed. It is shown that in the general case the most appropriate imaging method is the back-propagation method, which is based on the back-propagation of the angular spectrum of transmit-receive signals. The relative performance of the imaging methods is illustrated using simulated and experimental data.

[1]  H. Pursey,et al.  The field and radiation impedance of mechanical radiators on the free surface of a semi-infinite isotropic solid , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  P. Wilcox,et al.  Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit-receive array data for non-destructive evaluation , 2005 .

[3]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review , 2006 .

[4]  Francesco Simonetti,et al.  Time-Reversal MUSIC Imaging of Extended Targets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  Advanced Reflector Characterization with Ultrasonic Phased Arrays in NDE Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  G. Blacquière,et al.  Inverse wave field extrapolation: a different NDI approach to imaging defects , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Peter Monk,et al.  Recent Developments in Inverse Acoustic Scattering Theory , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[8]  Håkan Wirdelius,et al.  Ultrasonic probe modeling and nondestructive crack detection , 1995 .

[9]  R. Y. Chiao,et al.  Analytic evaluation of sampled aperture ultrasonic imaging techniques for NDE , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  C. Prada,et al.  Ultrasonic nondestructive testing of scattering media using the decomposition of the time-reversal operator , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  B. Auld General electromechanical reciprocity relations applied to the calculation of elastic wave scattering coefficients , 1979 .

[12]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  The wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix imaging using an ultrasonic array , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Sean K Lehman,et al.  Transmission mode time-reversal super-resolution imaging. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  A rapid signal processing technique to remove the effect of dispersion from guided wave signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Natalia Glushkova,et al.  An analytically based computer model for surface measurements in ultrasonic crack detection , 2006 .