The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks.

This paper outlines a role-based approach for conceptualizing and investigating the contention in some previous research that technologies change organizational and occupational structures by transforming patterns of action and interaction. Building on Nadel's theory of social structure, the paper argues that the microsocial dynamics occasioned by new technologies reverberate up levels of analysis in an orderly manner. Specifically, a technology's material attributes are said to have an immediate impact on the nonrelational elements of one or more work roles. These changes, in turn, influence the role's relational elements, which eventually affect the structure of an organization's social networks. Consequently, roles and social networks are held to mediate a technology's structural effects. The theory is illustrated by ethnographic and sociometric data drawn from a comparative field study of the use of traditional and computerized imaging devices in two radiology departments.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[3]  Robert H. Guest,et al.  The Man On The Assembly Line , 1952 .

[4]  Daniel Leo McGuinness,et al.  Automation and the worker , 1954 .

[5]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Automobile Workers and the American Dream , 1955 .

[6]  S. Nadel.  The Theory of Social Structure , 1957 .

[7]  H. G. Maule.  Productivity and Social Organization: The Ahmedabad Experiment , 1958 .

[8]  E. C. Hughes.  Men And Their Work , 1959 .

[9]  N. Seear,et al.  Productivity and Social Organization: The Ahmedabad Experiment. , 1959 .

[10]  Harold Rosenbaum,et al.  Modern Radiology in Historical Perspective , 1963 .

[11]  Robert Blauner,et al.  Alienation and Freedom , 1965 .

[12]  W. Faunce.  AUTOMATION AND THE DIVISION OF LABOR , 1965 .

[13]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[14]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[15]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[16]  M. Guttentag,et al.  Identities and Interactions: An Examination of Human Association in Everyday Life. , 1967 .

[17]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[18]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[19]  D. Pugh,et al.  Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1969 .

[20]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1971 .

[22]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[23]  A. L. Bertrand,et al.  The Theory of Organizations. , 1972 .

[24]  C. A. Brown.  The Division of Laborers: Allied Health Professions , 1973, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[25]  H. Braverman.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[26]  P. Khandwalla.  Mass Output Orientation of Operations Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1974 .

[27]  P. Arabie,et al.  An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling , 1975 .

[28]  R. Jacoby.  Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1976, Telos.

[29]  A. Giddens.  NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[30]  S. Boorman,et al.  Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  L. Hubert,et al.  Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. , 1976 .

[32]  P. Blau,et al.  Technology and Organization in Manufacturing , 1976 .

[33]  G. G. Stanfield.  Technology and Organization Structure as Theoretical Categories , 1976 .

[34]  David R. Maines,et al.  Social Organization and Social Structure in Symbolic Interactionist Thought , 1977 .

[35]  W. R. Scott,et al.  Technology and the structure of subunits: distinguishing individual and workgroup effects. , 1977, Administrative science quarterly.

[36]  L. Zucker.  The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[37]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  L. Winner.  Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought , 1977 .

[39]  G V Larkin,et al.  Medical Dominance and Control: Radiographers in the Division of Labour , 1978, The Sociological review.

[40]  Evaluation of the CAT Scanner and Other Diagnostic Technologies , 1978, Health care management review.

[41]  R. Burt.  Models of Network Structure , 1980 .

[42]  P. Goldman,et al.  Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century , 1980 .

[43]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[44]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  A heuristic method for the comparison of related structures , 1981 .

[45]  Lawrence Hubert,et al.  The Analysis of Social Interaction Data , 1981 .

[46]  L W Fry,et al.  Technology-structure research: three critical issues. , 1982, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[47]  F. Hull,et al.  The Effect of Technology on Alienation from Work , 1982 .

[48]  R. Burt.  Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[49]  S. Wood,et al.  The Degradation of work? : skill, deskilling and the labour process , 1983 .

[50]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[51]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Socio-Technical Design , 1985 .

[52]  Harley Shaiken,et al.  Work Transformed: Automation and Labor in the Computer Age , 1985 .

[53]  James R. Lincoln,et al.  Organizational Structures in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing , 1986 .

[54]  C. Debresson,et al.  Forces of production : a social history of industrial automation , 1985 .

[55]  Stuart W. Leslie,et al.  Forces of production : a social history of industrial automation , 1985 .

[56]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[57]  Christopher Winship.  Thoughts about roles and relations: An old document revisited , 1988 .

[58]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .