A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): A comparison to standard approaches

Functional MRI (fMRI) allows one to study task-related regional responses and task-dependent connectivity analysis using psychophysiological interaction (PPI) methods. The latter affords the additional opportunity to understand how brain regions interact in a task-dependent manner. The current implementation of PPI in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) is configured primarily to assess connectivity differences between two task conditions, when in practice fMRI tasks frequently employ more than two conditions. Here we evaluate how a generalized form of context-dependent PPI (gPPI; http://www.nitrc.org/projects/gppi), which is configured to automatically accommodate more than two task conditions in the same PPI model by spanning the entire experimental space, compares to the standard implementation in SPM8. These comparisons are made using both simulations and an empirical dataset. In the simulated dataset, we compare the interaction beta estimates to their expected values and model fit using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We found that interaction beta estimates in gPPI were robust to different simulated data models, were not different from the expected beta value, and had better model fits than when using standard PPI (sPPI) methods. In the empirical dataset, we compare the model fit of the gPPI approach to sPPI. We found that the gPPI approach improved model fit compared to sPPI. There were several regions that became non-significant with gPPI. These regions all showed significantly better model fits with gPPI. Also, there were several regions where task-dependent connectivity was only detected using gPPI methods, also with improved model fit. Regions that were detected with all methods had more similar model fits. These results suggest that gPPI may have greater sensitivity and specificity than standard implementation in SPM. This notion is tempered slightly as there is no gold standard; however, data simulations with a known outcome support our conclusions about gPPI. In sum, the generalized form of context-dependent PPI approach has increased flexibility of statistical modeling, and potentially improves model fit, specificity to true negative findings, and sensitivity to true positive findings.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[2]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Distributed and causal influence of frontal operculum in task control , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[5]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[8]  Silke Dodel,et al.  Condition-dependent functional connectivity: syntax networks in bilinguals , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Likelihood-Based Hypothesis Tests for Brain Activation Detection From MRI Data Disturbed by Colored Noise: A Simulation Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Thomas M. Ludden,et al.  Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection , 1994, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[11]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Effective connectivity of cortical and subcortical regions during unification of sentence structure , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Sleep deprivation and its effects on object-selective attention , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  The influence of parental history of Alzheimer's disease and apolipoprotein E epsilon4 on the BOLD signal during recognition memory. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[15]  Jieun Kim,et al.  Investigating the neural basis for fMRI-based functional connectivity in a blocked design: application to interregional correlations and psycho-physiological interactions. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  J. Lindsey,et al.  Choosing among generalized linear models applied to medical data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Yaakov Stern,et al.  An event-related fMRI study of the neural networks underlying repetition suppression and reaction time priming in implicit visual memory , 2006, Brain Research.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[19]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Mixed blocked/event-related designs separate transient and sustained activity in fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  Sterling C. Johnson,et al.  Self-appraisal decisions evoke dissociated dorsal—ventral aMPFC networks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  G McCarthy,et al.  The effects of single-trial averaging upon the spatial extent of fMRI activation , 2001, Neuroreport.

[23]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  A bilateral occipitotemporal network mediates face perception , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.