Rapid Identification of Myocardial Infarction Risk Associated With Diabetes Medications Using Electronic Medical Records

OBJECTIVE To assess the ability to identify potential association(s) of diabetes medications with myocardial infarction using usual care clinical data obtained from the electronic medical record. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We defined a retrospective cohort of patients (n = 34,253) treated with a sulfonylurea, metformin, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone in a single academic health care network. All patients were aged >18 years with at least one prescription for one of the medications between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2006. The study outcome was acute myocardial infarction requiring hospitalization. We used a cumulative temporal approach to ascertain the calendar date for earliest identifiable risk associated with rosiglitazone compared with that for other therapies. RESULTS Sulfonylurea, metformin, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone therapy was prescribed for 11,200, 12,490, 1,879, and 806 patients, respectively. A total of 1,343 myocardial infarctions were identified. After adjustment for potential myocardial infarction risk factors, the relative risk for myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone was 1.3 (95% CI 1.1–1.6) compared with sulfonylurea, 2.2 (1.6–3.1) compared with metformin, and 2.2 (1.5–3.4) compared with pioglitazone. Prospective surveillance using these data would have identified increased risk for myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone compared with metformin within 18 months of its introduction with a risk ratio of 2.1 (95% CI 1.2–3.8). CONCLUSIONS Our results are consistent with a relative adverse cardiovascular risk profile for rosiglitazone. Our use of usual care electronic data sources from a large hospital network represents an innovative approach to rapid safety signal detection that may enable more effective postmarketing drug surveillance.

[1]  Teven,et al.  MORTALITY FROM CORONARY HEART DISEASE IN SUBJECTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND IN NONDIABETIC SUBJECTS WITH AND WITHOUT PRIOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION , 2000 .

[2]  Sebastian Schneeweiss,et al.  Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records. , 2004, American heart journal.

[3]  Erland Erdmann,et al.  Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[4]  Robert T. Chen,et al.  Active Surveillance of Vaccine Safety: A System to Detect Early Signs of Adverse Events , 2005, Epidemiology.

[5]  Manfred Hauben,et al.  Signal detection in pharmacovigilance: empirical evaluation of data mining tools , 2005, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[6]  B. Zinman,et al.  Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Avorn In defense of pharmacoepidemiology--embracing the yin and yang of drug research. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Yoon K Loke,et al.  Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. , 2007, JAMA.

[9]  C. Koro,et al.  Studies of diabetes, thiazolidinediones, and coronary heart disease , 2007, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[10]  Sanjay Kaul,et al.  Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  Tara Gomes,et al.  Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular outcomes in older patients with diabetes. , 2007, JAMA.

[12]  S. Nissen,et al.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Alfonso T. Perez,et al.  A comparison of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone for hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes , 2007, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[14]  A. Lincoff,et al.  Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2007, JAMA.

[15]  N. Marchionni,et al.  Rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Hanefeld,et al.  Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Misbin Lessons From the Avandia Controversy , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[18]  L. Kennedy Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes—An Interim Analysis , 2008 .

[19]  J. Leahy Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death , 2008 .

[20]  R. Holman,et al.  10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  W. Winkelmayer,et al.  Comparison of cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with diabetes who initiated rosiglitazone vs pioglitazone therapy. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  Coronary heart disease outcomes in patients receiving antidiabetic agents in the PharMetrics database 2000–2007 , 2008, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[23]  S. Schinner,et al.  Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes , 2009 .

[24]  M. Hanefeld,et al.  Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[25]  R. Tannen,et al.  Use of primary care electronic medical record database in drug efficacy research on cardiovascular outcomes: comparison of database and randomised controlled trial findings , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Maria Mori Brooks,et al.  A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Michael E. Miller,et al.  ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY GROUP. EFFECTS OF INTENSIVE GLUCOSE LOWERING IN TYPE 2 DIABETES , 2010 .