Dementia and the Limits to Life: Anthropological Sensibilities, STS Interferences, and Possibilities for Action in Care

It is often assumed that it was the alliance between patient associations and neuroscience, which originally made dementia a matter for intervention. In parallel ways, science and technology studies (STS) often attributes the power to define and act upon matters of life to biomedicine and science. The concern here is that the science centrism of STS contributes to the dominance of science and biomedicine by granting these analytical privileges. As a result, alternative modes of acting, for instance in care, are disarticulated and made absent. This article mobilizes the sensibilities of anthropology to difference and draws upon excerpts of data from fieldwork in dementia care to show this and argue that there are different practices that act upon life and its limits; that these enact different versions of life and dementia; and that they matter because they shape how people are cared for and live and die with dementia.

[1]  I. Hacking.  The Social Construction of What , 1999 .

[2]  Lawrence Cohen,et al.  Thinking About Dementia: Culture, Loss, and the Anthropology of Senility , 2006 .

[3]  Neil Charness,et al.  Aging and expertise , 2006 .

[4]  E. Shorter.  About the history of sexuality. , 2007, Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica : a Magyar Pszichofarmakologiai Egyesulet lapja = official journal of the Hungarian Association of Psychopharmacology.

[5]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Breathtaking practicalities: a politics of embodied patient positions , 2011 .

[6]  J. Bond,et al.  Regulatory Objectivity in Action , 2009 .

[7]  M. Mcneil.  Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1992 .

[8]  J. Ballenger.  Self, Senility, and Alzheimer's Disease in Modern America , 2006 .

[9]  A. Mol.  Care and its values: good food in the nursing home , 2010 .

[10]  M. Fischer.  Emergent Forms of Life and the Anthropological Voice , 2003 .

[11]  Annemarie Mol,et al.  Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: the Example of Hypoglycaemia , 2004 .

[12]  W. Rothstein.  Writing at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine , 1996 .

[13]  Emily Martin,et al.  Anthropology and the Cultural Study of Science , 1998 .

[14]  J. Hays,et al.  Writing in the Margin , 2005 .

[15]  Ingunn Moser.  Perhaps tears should not be counted but wiped away On quality and improvement in dementia care , 2010, Care in Practice.

[16]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[17]  Janelle S Taylor.  : Remaking Life & Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences , 2005 .

[18]  John Bond,et al.  The medicalization of dementia , 1992 .

[19]  Tiago Moreira.  Hope and truth in drug development and evaluation in Alzheimer's Disease. , 2009 .

[20]  G. Grob.  Self, Senility, and Alzheimer's Disease in Modern America: A History , 2006 .

[21]  H. Harbers,et al.  Book Review: Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge; The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2005 .

[22]  P. Palladino,et al.  Ageing between Gerontology and Biomedicine , 2009 .

[23]  Janelle S Taylor,et al.  On recognition, caring, and dementia. , 2008, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[24]  Ingunn Moser.  Diagnosing and Acting upon Dementia: Marte Meo , 2010 .

[25]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  The Politics of Life Itself , 2001, The New Social Theory Reader.

[26]  J. Law,et al.  Performing Technology's Stories: On Social Constructivism, Performance, and Performativity , 2000 .

[27]  J. Law.  After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[28]  P. Fox.  From senility to Alzheimer's disease: the rise of the Alzheimer's disease movement. , 1989, The Milbank quarterly.

[29]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Making Alzheimer’s disease matter. Enacting, interfering and doing politics of nature , 2008 .

[30]  A. Leibing,et al.  Thinking About Dementia , 2006 .

[31]  Michel Callon,et al.  Gino’s lesson on humanity: genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist’s role , 2004 .

[32]  M. Lock.  Dementia Entanglements in a Postgenomic Era , 2011 .

[33]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[34]  Henrik Loodin,et al.  The politics of life itself Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century , 2009 .

[35]  A. Kleinman,et al.  Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture: An Exploration of the Borderland between Anthropology, Medicine, and Psychiatry. , 1983 .

[36]  A. J. Pols.  Good care : enacting a complex ideal in long-term psychiatry , 2004 .

[37]  J. Niewöhner,et al.  Investigating Emerging Biomedical Practices: Zones of Awkward Engagement on Different Scales , 2011 .