The relationship between cup-to-disc ratio and estimated number of retinal ganglion cells.

PURPOSE To investigate the relationship between cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and estimates of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 156 healthy eyes, 53 glaucoma suspects, and 127 eyes with glaucoma. All eyes had standard automated perimetry (SAP), Cirrus SD-OCT, and stereoscopic optic disc photography within 6 months. CDR was determined from stereoscopic photographs by two or more masked graders. The number of RGCs in each eye was estimated using a published model that combines estimates of RGC number from SAP sensitivity thresholds and SD-OCT retinal nerve fiber layer measurements. RESULTS The mean estimated RGC count was 1,063,809 in healthy eyes; 828,522 in eyes with suspected glaucoma; and 774,200 in early, 468,568 in moderate, and 218,471 in advanced glaucoma. Healthy eyes had a mean vertical CDR of 0.45 ± 0.15 vs. 0.80 ± 0.16 in glaucomatous eyes. There was good correlation between stereophotographic vertical CDR and SD-OCT vertical CDR (R(2) = 0.825; P < 0.001). The relationship between estimated RGCs and vertical CDR was best represented using a third degree polynomial regression model, including age and optic disc area, which accounted for 83.3% of the variation in estimated RGC counts. The nonlinear relationship between RGC estimates and CDRs indicated that eyes with a large CDR would require loss of large RGC numbers for a small increase in CDR. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between estimated RGC counts and CDR suggests that assessment of change in CDR is an insensitive method for evaluation of progressive neural losses in glaucoma. Even relatively small changes in CDR may be associated with large losses of RGCs, especially in eyes with large CDRs. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00221923, NCT00221897.).

[1]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The structure and function relationship in glaucoma: implications for detection of progression and measurement of rates of change. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[4]  F. Medeiros,et al.  A combined index of structure and function for staging glaucomatous damage. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting , 1988 .

[6]  J. Crowston,et al.  Validation of a predictive model to estimate the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  H A Quigley,et al.  The effect of age on normal human optic nerve fiber number and diameter. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[8]  M Schulzer,et al.  The normal human optic nerve. Axon count and axon diameter distribution. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Y. Buys,et al.  Disc photography and heidelberg retinal tomography documentation of reversal of cupping following trabeculectomy , 2010, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  R L Williams,et al.  A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster‐Correlated Data , 2000, Biometrics.

[12]  I. Scott,et al.  Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[13]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Evaluating the Optic Disc and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Glaucoma I: Clinical Examination and Photographic Methods , 2000, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): design and baseline data. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Linking structure and function in glaucoma , 2010, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[17]  G. Spaeth,et al.  The practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of cup progression and some specific disc-field correlations. , 1974, Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[18]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Clinical Decisions In Glaucoma , 1993 .

[19]  J. Jonas,et al.  Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  T. Wong,et al.  Influence of refractive error on optic disc topographic parameters: the singapore malay eye study. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Hitchings,et al.  An optic disc grid: its evaluation in reproducibility studies on the cup/disc ratio. , 1983, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Modeling the effects of aging on retinal ganglion cell density and nerve fiber layer thickness , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[23]  Susan Vitale,et al.  Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  S M Podos,et al.  Vertical elongation of the optic cup in glaucoma. , 1973, Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.

[25]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[26]  A. Sommer,et al.  Race and primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  M Schulzer,et al.  The effect of age on the nerve fiber population of the human optic nerve. , 1984, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  A. Sommer,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[29]  S. Vernon,et al.  Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (Discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Age-related losses of retinal ganglion cells and axons. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  J. Jonas,et al.  Morphometry of the human lamina cribrosa surface. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  William J Feuer,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[33]  E. Carpel,et al.  The normal cup-disk ratio. , 1981, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  M. F. Armaly.  Genetic determination of cup/disc ratio of the optic nerve. , 1967, Archives of ophthalmology.

[35]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[36]  P. Lichter.  Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. , 1976, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[37]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[38]  R. Burk,et al.  Are large optic nerve heads susceptible to glaucomatous damage at normal intraocular pressure? , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[39]  A. Iwase,et al.  Laser scanning tomography of optic discs of the normal Japanese population in a population-based setting. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[40]  G Smith,et al.  Observer variability in optic disc assessment: implications for glaucoma shared care. , 2000, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[41]  A Sommer,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Detection of Glaucomatous Progression of the Optic Disc , 1996, Journal of glaucoma.

[42]  George L Spaeth,et al.  Systems for staging the amount of optic nerve damage in glaucoma: a critical review and new material. , 2006, Survey of ophthalmology.

[43]  J. Jonas,et al.  Retinal photoreceptor count, retinal surface area, and optic disc size in normal human eyes. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[44]  J. Jonas,et al.  Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  D. Snydacker.  THE NORMAL OPTIC DISC. OPHTHALMOSCOPIC AND PHOTOGRAPHIC STUDIES. , 1964, American journal of ophthalmology.

[46]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Agreement Between Stereophotographic and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Measurements of Cup/Disc Ratio: Effect on a Predictive Model for Glaucoma Development , 2007, Journal of glaucoma.

[47]  R A Hitchings,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[48]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Rates of neuroretinal rim and peripapillary atrophy area change: a comparative study of glaucoma patients and normal controls. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[49]  Spaeth Gl,et al.  The practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of cup progression and some specific disc-field correlations. , 1974 .