Personal and psychosocial factors and symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome in the Swedish workforce.

A random sample of 1000 subjects (20-65 years of age) received a postal questionnaire regarding sick building syndrome (SBS), including the three-dimensional model of demand-control-support (DCS). The response rate was 70% (n = 695), and 532 were occupationally active. Female gender and atopy were the main predictors of symptoms. Eye symptoms were more common at low social support combined with strained work situation [odds ratio (OR) 2.37], and at high social support combined with active work situation (OR 3.00). Throat symptoms were more common at low social support combined with either passive (OR 1.86) or strained situation (OR 2.42). Tiredness was more common at low social support combined with either passive (OR 2.41), strained (OR 2.25), or active situation (OR 1.87), and at high social support combined with active work situation (OR 1.83). Low social support combined with either passive (P = 0.01) or strained job situation (P = 0.01) was associated with a higher symptom score (SC). The lowest SC was found at a relaxed work situation, irrespective of social support. In conclusion, female gender, low age, asthma, atopy and psychosocial work environment are associated with symptoms. The three-dimensional model can predict symptoms compatible with SBS, but in a more complex way than earlier research indicated. Practical Implications A multi-disciplinary approach, including psychosocial stress factors as well as personal factors such as gender, age, atopy and asthma, and indoor exposures, should be applied in studies on symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome (SBS). Males and females perceive psychosocial work conditions differently, and may react differently to job stressors. The psychosocial work environment can be as important as gender and atopy as a predictor of SBS symptoms.

[1]  P. Boxer,et al.  Indoor air quality: a psychosocial perspective. , 1990, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[2]  C. Muntaner,et al.  Does organization matter? A multilevel analysis of the demand-control model applied to human services. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[3]  R J Rycroft,et al.  Low humidity occupational dermatoses , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  T Akerstedt,et al.  Changes in job strain in relation to changes in physiological state. A longitudinal study. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[5]  K. Wahlstedt,et al.  Psychosocial factors and psychosomatic complaints among postal workers , 1994 .

[6]  Alan Hedge,et al.  Individual and Occupational Correlates of the Sick Building Syndrome , 1995 .

[7]  K. Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Psychosocial job factors and symptoms from the locomotor system--a multicausal analysis. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  Sick building syndrome, sensation of dryness and thermal comfort in relation to room temperature in an office building: Need for individual control of temperature , 1989 .

[9]  C A Pickering,et al.  Building sickness syndrome in healthy and unhealthy buildings: an epidemiological and environmental assessment with cluster analysis , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[10]  H J Gebhardt,et al.  Why do women suffer from sick building syndrome more often than men?--subjective higher sensitivity versus objective causes. , 2001, Indoor air.

[11]  P Wargocki,et al.  Effects of pollution from personal computers on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and productivity in offices. , 2004, Indoor air.

[12]  Jan Sundell,et al.  A Prevalence Study Of The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) And Facial Skin Symptoms In Office Workers , 1993 .

[13]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  Non‐Specific Symptoms In Office Workers: A Review And Summary Of The Epidemiologic Literature , 1993 .

[14]  D Norbäck,et al.  Indoor air quality and personal factors related to the sick building syndrome. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[15]  B. V. Pedersen,et al.  Influence of personal characteristics, job-related factors and psychosocial factors on the sick building syndrome. Danish Indoor Climate Study Group. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[16]  D. Norbäck,et al.  Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population. , 1991, British journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  T. Theorell,et al.  Social support, job strain and musculoskeletal pain among female health care personnel. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  B. Berglund,et al.  Relationships between occupant personality and the sick building syndrome explored. , 2000, Indoor air.

[19]  P. Östergren,et al.  Common symptoms in middle aged women: their relation to employment status, psychosocial work conditions and social support in a Swedish setting , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[20]  M. Bullinger,et al.  The sick building syndrome as a subjective perception-theoretical approach and assessment methods. , 1999, Zentralblatt fur Hygiene und Umweltmedizin = International journal of hygiene and environmental medicine.

[21]  Jeffrey V. Johnson.  The impact of workplace social support, job demands and work control upon cardiovascular disease in Sweden. , 1986 .

[22]  T. Theorell,et al.  A psychosocial and biomedical comparison between men in six contrasting service occupations , 1990 .

[23]  Alan Hedge,et al.  Work-related illness in offices: A proposed model of the “sick building syndrome” , 1989 .

[24]  K. Wahlstedt,et al.  Organizational changes at a postal sorting terminal—their effects upon work satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and sick leave , 1997 .

[25]  D Norbäck,et al.  Development of a multiple regression model to identify multi-family residential buildings with a high prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS). , 2000, Indoor air.

[26]  A Hedge,et al.  Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers. , 1987, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[27]  K. Goh,et al.  Epidemiology of sick building syndrome and its associated risk factors in Singapore. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[28]  D Norbäck,et al.  Symptoms and sense of coherence – a follow-up study of personnel from workplace buildings with indoor air problems , 2003, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[29]  E. L. Besch,et al.  The role of psychological factors in the report of building-related symptoms in sick building syndrome. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[30]  A. Apter,et al.  Epidemiology of the sick building syndrome. , 1994, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[31]  R Nordemar,et al.  Pain thresholds during standardized psychological stress in relation to perceived psychosocial work situation. Stockholm Music I Study Group. , 1993, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[32]  D. Norbäck,et al.  The influence of personality, measured by the Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP), on symptoms among subjects in suspected sick buildings. , 2004, Indoor air.

[33]  J. Crawford,et al.  Sick building syndrome, work factors and occupational stress. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.