Implementing the LifeSkills Training drug prevention program: factors related to implementation fidelity

BackgroundWidespread replication of effective prevention programs is unlikely to affect the incidence of adolescent delinquency, violent crime, and substance use until the quality of implementation of these programs by community-based organizations can be assured.MethodsThis paper presents the results of a process evaluation employing qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the extent to which 432 schools in 105 sites implemented the LifeSkills Training (LST) drug prevention program with fidelity. Regression analysis was used to examine factors influencing four dimensions of fidelity: adherence, dosage, quality of delivery, and student responsiveness.ResultsAlthough most sites faced common barriers, such as finding room in the school schedule for the program, gaining full support from key participants (i.e., site coordinators, principals, and LST teachers), ensuring teacher participation in training workshops, and classroom management difficulties, most schools involved in the project implemented LST with very high levels of fidelity. Across sites, 86% of program objectives and activities required in the three-year curriculum were delivered to students. Moreover, teachers were observed using all four recommended teaching practices, and 71% of instructors taught all the required LST lessons. Multivariate analyses found that highly rated LST program characteristics and better student behavior were significantly related to a greater proportion of material taught by teachers (adherence). Instructors who rated the LST program characteristics as ideal were more likely to teach all lessons (dosage). Student behavior and use of interactive teaching techniques (quality of delivery) were positively related. No variables were related to student participation (student responsiveness).ConclusionAlthough difficult, high implementation fidelity by community-based organizations can be achieved. This study suggests some important factors that organizations should consider to ensure fidelity, such as selecting programs with features that minimize complexity while maximizing flexibility. Time constraints in the classroom should be considered when choosing a program. Student behavior also influences program delivery, so schools should train teachers in the use of classroom management skills. This project involved comprehensive program monitoring and technical assistance that likely facilitated the identification and resolution of problems and contributed to the overall high quality of implementation. Schools should recognize the importance of training and technical assistance to ensure quality program delivery.

[1]  M. Jeffries Know your body , 1976 .

[2]  J. Petersilia,et al.  Implementing new ideas in criminal justice , 1983 .

[3]  S. W. Fors,et al.  Implication of Results: Factors for Success. , 1985 .

[4]  D. Connell,et al.  Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs. , 1985, The Journal of school health.

[5]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  The fidelity-adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs , 1987 .

[6]  Richard I. Evans,et al.  Life skills training. , 1988 .

[7]  J. Fagan Treatment and reintegration of violent juvenile offenders: Experimental results , 1990 .

[8]  Joan Petersilia,et al.  Conditions That Permit Intensive Supervision Programs to Survive , 1990 .

[9]  C. Perry,et al.  Evaluating the statewide dissemination of smoking prevention curricula: factors in teacher compliance. , 1990, The Journal of school health.

[10]  P. Bush,et al.  A process evaluation of the District of Columbia "Know Your Body" project. , 1990, The Journal of school health.

[11]  R. Luepker,et al.  Teenage health teaching modules: impact of teacher training on implementation and student outcomes. , 1991, The Journal of school health.

[12]  R. Weissberg,et al.  Promoting competent young people in competence-enhancing environments: a systems-based perspective on primary prevention. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  R. Weissberg,et al.  Promoting competent young people in competence-enhancing environments : a systems-based perspective on primary prevention , 1991 .

[14]  G. Parcel,et al.  Enhancing implementation of the teenage health teaching modules. , 1991, The Journal of school health.

[15]  P. Gingiss Enhancing program implementation and maintenance through a multiphase approach to peer-based staff development. , 1992, The Journal of school health.

[16]  J. Graham,et al.  Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation. , 1993, Preventive medicine.

[17]  Frank M. Gresham,et al.  Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990. , 1993 .

[18]  Michelle P. Salyers,et al.  Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  A. Steckler,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations in Schools: A Study of Adoption and Implementation of School-Based Tobacco Prevention Curricula , 1995, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[20]  G. Botvin,et al.  Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. , 1995, JAMA.

[21]  W. B. Hansen Pilot test results comparing the All Stars program with seventh grade D.A.R.E.: program integrity and mediating variable analysis. , 1996, Substance use & misuse.

[22]  David B. Wilson,et al.  School Based Crime Prevention , 1997 .

[23]  Abraham Wandersman,et al.  Toward a framework for bridging the gap between science and practice in prevention: A focus on evaluator and practitioner perspectives , 1997 .

[24]  M. Elias,et al.  Implementing prevention programs in high-risk environments: application of the resiliency paradigm. , 1997, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[25]  S. Henggeler,et al.  Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: the role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  R Kosterman,et al.  Changing teaching practices to promote achievement and bonding to school. , 1998, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[27]  Peter Reuter,et al.  Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Research in Brief. National Institute of Justice. , 1998 .

[28]  J. Dubas,et al.  Successful Program Development Using Implementation Evaluation , 1998 .

[29]  Andrew V. Dane,et al.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[30]  D. Farrington,et al.  Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions , 1999 .

[31]  Mark T. Greenberg,et al.  The Study of Implementation: Current Findings From Effective Programs that Prevent Mental Disorders in School-Aged Children , 2000 .

[32]  Denise C. Gottfredson,et al.  Schools and Delinquency: Lost in Translation: Why Doesn't School-Based Prevention Work as Well as It Should? , 2000 .

[33]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions , 2000 .

[34]  L. Brunson,et al.  Implementation and Diffusion of the Rainbows Program in Rural Communities: Implications for School-Based Prevention Programming , 2000 .

[35]  Katherine Irwin,et al.  Blueprints for Violence Prevention , 2003 .

[36]  Katherine Irwin,et al.  Blueprints for Violence Prevention , 2001 .

[37]  L. Nabors,et al.  School-based Aggression Prevention Programs for Young Children: Current Status and Implications for Violence Prevention , 2001 .

[38]  M. Elias,et al.  School-Based Violence Prevention: Challenges and Lessons Learned from an Action Research Project , 2001 .

[39]  Eva M. Kung,et al.  Development and Evaluation of School-Based Violence Prevention Programs , 2001, Journal of clinical child psychology.

[40]  R. Prinz,et al.  Promoting intervention fidelity. Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[41]  Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General , 2001, Psychiatric services.

[42]  M. Guyll,et al.  Two studies of proximal outcomes and implementation quality of universal preventive interventions in a community–university collaboration context , 2002 .

[43]  D. Gottfredson,et al.  Quality of School-Based Prevention Programs: Results from a National Survey , 2002 .

[44]  Mary Kay Rayens,et al.  Efficacy of training and fidelity of implementation of the life skills training program. , 2002, The Journal of school health.

[45]  Sue Scott,et al.  Implementation of a teacher-delivered sex education programme: obstacles and facilitating factors. , 2002, Health education research.

[46]  D. Hallfors,et al.  Will the 'principles of effectiveness' improve prevention practice? Early findings from a diffusion study. , 2002, Health education research.

[47]  Abigail A. Fagan,et al.  Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school‐based prevention programs: Lessons learned from the Blueprints for Violence Prevention replications of the Life Skills Training program , 2003 .

[48]  Mathea Falco,et al.  A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. , 2003, Health education research.

[49]  Cindy A. Crusto,et al.  Comprehensive Quality Programming and Accountability: Eight Essential Strategies for Implementing Successful Prevention Programs , 1998, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[50]  C. Kam,et al.  Examining the Role of Implementation Quality in School-Based Prevention Using the PATHS Curriculum , 2003, Prevention Science.

[51]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Issues in Disseminating and Replicating Effective Prevention Programs , 2004, Prevention Science.

[52]  Mathea Falco,et al.  Quality of implementation: developing measures crucial to understanding the diffusion of preventive interventions. , 2005, Health education research.

[53]  M. B. Greene Reducing Violence and Aggression in Schools , 2005, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[54]  Karen A. Blase,et al.  Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the , 2005 .

[55]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims and Places , 2007 .

[56]  K. Hofman,et al.  Implementation Science , 2007, Science.

[57]  Lyne Weiland,et al.  Bullying Prevention Program , 2010 .