A Mixed-Methods Approach for Studying Collaborative Learning Processes at Individual and Group Levels

Learning processes that unfold during small-group collaboration may impact conceptual outcomes for individual students. To study how learning processes unfolded for eighth grade students collaborating in an e-textbook research activity, we analyzed data sources at individual and group levels using multiple methods, including nonparametric tests, text mining, Markov modeling, and quantitative discourse analysis. Individual measures revealed learning gains on content tests and documentation of shared ideas during collaboration. Group measures revealed increased conceptual discourse over time and streamlining of the research process. Measures at each level indicated distinct paths of inquiry for students and groups; however, these differences were not associated with negative conceptual outcomes. These findings have implications for how we understand how collaborative learning processes unfold, especially between the individual and the group, and how we design support for collaboration and knowledge sharing.

[1]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[2]  Negotiation Towards Intersubjectivity and Impacts on Conceptual Outcomes , 2016, ICLS.

[3]  Judy Kay,et al.  Analyzing Collaborative Interactions with Data Mining Methods for the Benefit of Learning , 2011 .

[4]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research , 2007 .

[5]  P. V. H. Weems,et al.  Learning to Navigate , 1943 .

[6]  J. Wertsch The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues† , 1984 .

[7]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[8]  Manu Kapur,et al.  A Complexity-Grounded Model for the Emergence of Convergence in CSCL Groups , 2011 .

[9]  Sadhana Puntambekar Mixed Methods for Analyzing Collaborative Learning , 2013 .

[10]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Tracing interaction in distributed collaborative learning. , 2011 .

[11]  Peter Reimann,et al.  Time is precious: why process analysis is essential for CSCL (and can also help to bridge between experimental and descriptive methods) , 2007, CSCL.

[12]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[13]  Jing Wang,et al.  Assessing Collaborative Process in CSCL with an Intelligent Content Analysis Toolkit , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[14]  J. Roschelle Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[15]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[16]  Susanne P. Lajoie Is the Whole Greater than the Sum of Its Parts? Explaining the Role of Individual Learning and Group Processes in CSCL , 2011 .