Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI

Accurate measurement of the arterial input function is critical for quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data. Use of the reference tissue method to derive a local arterial input function avoided large errors associated with direct arterial measurements, but relied on literature values for Ktrans and ve. We demonstrate that accurate values of Ktrans and ve in a reference tissue can be measured by comparing contrast media concentration in a reference tissue to plasma concentrations measured directly in a local artery after the 1–2 passes of the contrast media bolus—when plasma concentration is low and can be measured accurately. The values of Ktrans and ve calculated for the reference tissue can then be used to derive a more complete arterial input function including the first pass of the contrast bolus. This new approach was demonstrated using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data from rodent hind limb. Values obtained for Ktrans and ve in muscle, and the shape and amplitude of the derived arterial input function are consistent with published results. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Michael Brady,et al.  Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  C. Ludwig,et al.  A method for interleaved acquisition of a vascular input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in experimental rat tumours , 2004, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): A simulation study , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. Knopp,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI using Gd‐DTPA: Interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  G S Karczmar,et al.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Wei Huang,et al.  Evidence for shutter‐speed variation in CR bolus‐tracking studies of human pathology , 2005, NMR in biomedicine.

[8]  A Radjenovic,et al.  Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2008, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  W. F. Blair,et al.  Flow field mapping in the anesthetized rat , 1990, Microsurgery.

[10]  Milica Medved,et al.  Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of the Prostate , 2008, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[13]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng,et al.  T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1‐weighted DCE‐MRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Gregory S Karczmar,et al.  Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI studies: Fundamental concepts and simulations , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  I. Zimine,et al.  Inflow effect correction in fast gradient‐echo perfusion imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Variation of the relaxographic “shutter‐speed” for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus‐tracking curve shape , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Geoffrey J M Parker,et al.  Comparison of model‐based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Claudia Weidensteiner,et al.  Quantitative dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in tumor‐bearing rats and mice with inversion recovery TrueFISP and two contrast agents at 4.7 T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Egill Rostrup,et al.  Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1‐weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  New model for analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE‐MRI data , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.