Predicting Pilot Task Demand Load During Final Approach

This research aims at developing a method to assess the safety of airport approaches from the perspective of airline pilots. The main hypothesis is that safety is inversely proportional to the task demand load (TDL) experienced by the pilots conducting it. The TDL is the mental workload imposed by the system to be controlled, and is not to be mistaken for the mental workload experienced by the operator, referred to as mental load. This article presents the results of preliminary research that focused on how some of the environmental factors that determine the approach, such as the type of aircraft and the meteorological conditions, affect the TDL. A paper pilot model, consisting of a scanning model, mental model, and control model, was used to quantify how hard an average pilot has to work to conduct the specified approach. Offline computer simulations with this model revealed some clear trends in pilot scanning rate, task error, and control activity, as a function of the environmental factors, which will eventually allow for a prediction and quantification of the TDL. Depending on the approach performance requirements on the one hand, and the pilot scanning capacity on the other, increasing turbulence intensity showed a change in trend for all TDL-related parameters at a particular turbulence intensity. Results from a pilot-in-the-loop evaluation, conducted in a fixed-base flight simulator, supported the main trends of the offline simulation trials. They also indicated that through adopting different scanning strategies, pilots can leverage their workload; more research is necessary to clarify this result, however.

[1]  K. M. Corker,et al.  A systems engineering approach to behavioral predictions of an advanced air traffic management concept , 2000, 19th DASC. 19th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37126).

[2]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  ACCIDENT RISK ASSESSMENT OF SIMULTANEOUS CONVERGING INSTRUMENT APPROACHES , 2003 .

[3]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[4]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Attentional Models of Multitask Pilot Performance Using Advanced Display Technology , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[5]  G. D. Padfield,et al.  Helicopter Flight Dynamics: The Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling , 1995 .

[6]  Sheldon Baron,et al.  PROCRU: A model for analyzing flight crew procedures in approach to landing , 1980 .

[7]  T. Teichmann,et al.  Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control , 1959 .

[8]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[9]  A. D. Bruin,et al.  Wake vortex safety evaluation of single runway approaches under different weather and operational conditions , 2002 .

[10]  G. J. Bakker,et al.  Accident risk assessment for airborne separation assurance , 2002 .

[11]  Randall L. Harris,et al.  What Do Pilots See in Displays? , 1980 .

[12]  J. R. Carbonell.  A Queueing Model of Many-Instrument Visual Sampling , 1966 .

[13]  R. D. Campbell,et al.  Human performance and limitations in aviation , 1991 .

[14]  Kevin M. Corker.  Human performance simulation in the analysis of advanced air traffic management , 1999, WSC '99.

[15]  C. Wickens,et al.  Visual scanning and pilot expertise: the role of attentional flexibility and mental model development. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  C. Wickens.  Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[17]  J. Shaoul.  Human Error , 1973, Nature.

[18]  R. Wever,et al.  Aviation causal model using Bayesian Belief Nets to quantify management influence , 2003 .

[19]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control , 1994 .

[20]  Henk G. Stassen,et al.  Internal representation, internal model, human performance model and mental workload , 1988, Autom..

[21]  D. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part II: Prediction of human performance in a complex task , 1970 .

[22]  G. J. Bakker,et al.  ACCIDENT RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ADVANCED ATM , 1999 .

[23]  R. Westrum,et al.  Organizational factors associated with safety and mission success in aviation environments. , 1999 .

[24]  Barry R. Smith,et al.  The Design and Application of MIDAS: A Constructive Simulation for Human-System Analysis , 2002 .

[25]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[26]  John W. Senders,et al.  The Human Operator as a Monitor and Controller of Multidegree of Freedom Systems , 1964 .

[27]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part I: Theory and validation , 1970 .