Multidimensional estimation of cardiac arrhythmia potential across space and time

All medications have adverse effects. Among the most serious of these are cardiac arrhythmias1. The current safety evaluation for cardiac toxicity involves interrogating effects of the drug on the delayed rectifier potassium current in single cells2 and the QT interval in healthy volunteers3. However, this paradigm for drug safety evaluation is costly4, lengthy5, conservative3, and impede efficient drug development6. Here we combine multiscale experiment and simulation, high-performance computing, and machine learning to create a multidimensional risk estimator to quickly and reliably stratify new and existing drugs according to their pro-arrhythmic potential. We capitalize on recent developments in machine learning and integrate information across ten orders of magnitude in space and time to provide a holistic picture of the effects of drugs, either individually or in combination with other drugs. We show, both experimentally and computationally, that drug-induced arrhythmias are dominated by the interplay between two currents with opposing effects: the rapid delayed rectifier potassium current and the L-type calcium current. Using Gaussian process classification, we create a classifier that stratifies drugs into safe and arrhythmic domains for any combinations of these two currents. We demonstrate that our classifier correctly identifies the risk categories of 23 common drugs, exclusively on the basis of their concentrations at 50% current block. Our new risk estimator explains under which conditions blocking the L-type calcium current can delay or even entirely suppress arrhythmogenic events. Using machine learning in drug safety evaluation can provide a more accurate and comprehensive mechanistic assessment of the pro-arrhythmic potential of new drugs. Our study paves the way towards establishing science-based criteria to accelerate drug development, design safer drugs, and reduce heart rhythm disorders.

[1]  E. Sobie,et al.  Improved Prediction of Drug‐Induced Torsades de Pointes Through Simulations of Dynamics and Machine Learning Algorithms , 2016, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  Natalia Trayanova,et al.  From genetics to smart watches: developments in precision cardiology , 2018, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[3]  Robert B. Gramacy,et al.  Particle Learning of Gaussian Process Models for Sequential Design and Optimization , 2009, 0909.5262.

[4]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  Early somatic mosaicism is a rare cause of long-QT syndrome , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Gary R. Mirams,et al.  Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds’ clinical torsadogenic risk , 2011, Cardiovascular research.

[6]  Jiang Yao,et al.  Predicting critical drug concentrations and torsadogenic risk using a multiscale exposure-response simulator. , 2019, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[7]  Hongbin Yang,et al.  Corrigendum: In Silico Prediction of Chemical Toxicity for Drug Design Using Machine Learning Methods and Structural Alerts , 2018, Front. Chem..

[8]  Kousik Krishnan,et al.  Current concepts in the mechanisms and management of drug-induced QT prolongation and torsade de pointes. , 2007, American heart journal.

[9]  S. Polak,et al.  Am I or am I not proarrhythmic? Comparison of various classifications of drug TdP propensity. , 2017, Drug discovery today.

[10]  Zhilin Qu,et al.  Stochastic initiation and termination of calcium-mediated triggered activity in cardiac myocytes , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  The Living Heart Project: A robust and integrative simulator for human heart function. , 2014, European journal of mechanics. A, Solids.

[12]  Yoram Rudy,et al.  Simulation of the Undiseased Human Cardiac Ventricular Action Potential: Model Formulation and Experimental Validation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  A. Garfinkel,et al.  Early afterdepolarizations in cardiac myocytes: beyond reduced repolarization reserve. , 2013, Cardiovascular research.

[14]  Gary R. Mirams,et al.  Computational assessment of drug-induced effects on the electrocardiogram: from ion channel to body surface potentials , 2013, British journal of pharmacology.

[15]  S. Göktepe,et al.  Computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology: A novel finite element approach , 2009 .

[16]  Amy Maxmen,et al.  Busting the billion-dollar myth: how to slash the cost of drug development , 2016, Nature.

[17]  F. S. Costabal,et al.  Machine learning in drug development: Characterizing the effect of 30 drugs on the QT interval using Gaussian process regression, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification. , 2019, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[18]  A. Camm,et al.  Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[19]  S. Göktepe,et al.  Computational modeling of chemo‐electro‐mechanical coupling: A novel implicit monolithic finite element approach , 2013, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[20]  Gary R. Mirams,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference for ion channel screening dose-response data , 2016, Wellcome open research.

[21]  Gary R. Mirams,et al.  Early afterdepolarisation tendency as a simulated pro-arrhythmic risk indicator , 2017, bioRxiv.

[22]  T. Colatsky,et al.  The Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative - Update on progress. , 2016, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[23]  D. Strauss,et al.  An evaluation of 30 clinical drugs against the comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) proposed ion channel panel. , 2016, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[24]  Jiang Yao,et al.  Predicting drug‐induced arrhythmias by multiscale modeling , 2018, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[25]  N. Trayanova,et al.  Computational models in cardiology , 2018, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[26]  E. Kuhl,et al.  Predicting the cardiac toxicity of drugs using a novel multiscale exposure–response simulator , 2018, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[27]  Jaimit Parikh,et al.  Novel Two-Step Classifier for Torsades de Pointes Risk Stratification from Direct Features , 2017, Front. Pharmacol..

[28]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[29]  D. Noble,et al.  A model for human ventricular tissue. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[30]  N. Stockbridge,et al.  Dealing with Global Safety Issues , 2013, Drug Safety.

[31]  George E Karniadakis,et al.  Omics, big data and machine learning as tools to propel understanding of biological mechanisms and to discover novel diagnostics and therapeutics. , 2018, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[32]  D. Noble,et al.  Mathematical models of the electrical action potential of Purkinje fibre cells , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.