Understanding Business Ecosystem Dynamics: A Data-Driven Approach

Business ecosystems consist of a heterogeneous and continuously evolving set of entities that are interconnected through a complex, global network of relationships. However, there is no well-established methodology to study the dynamics of this network. Traditional approaches have primarily utilized a single source of data of relatively established firms; however, these approaches ignore the vast number of relevant activities that often occur at the individual and entrepreneurial levels. We argue that a data-driven visualization approach, using both institutionally and socially curated datasets, can provide important complementary, triangulated explanatory insights into the dynamics of interorganizational networks in general and business ecosystems in particular. We develop novel visualization layouts to help decision makers systemically identify and compare ecosystems. Using traditionally disconnected data sources on deals and alliance relationships (DARs), executive and funding relationships (EFRs), and public opinion and discourse (POD), we empirically illustrate our data-driven method of data triangulation and visualization techniques through three cases in the mobile industry Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility, the coopetitive relation between Apple and Samsung, and the strategic partnership between Nokia and Microsoft. The article concludes with implications and future research opportunities.

[1]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[2]  N. Blaikie A critique of the use of triangulation in social research , 1991 .

[3]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Visualizing Sets and Set-typed Data: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges , 2014, EuroVis.

[4]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Collective Invention and Inventor Networks , 2010 .

[5]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[6]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[7]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Understanding Interfirm Relationships in Business Ecosystems with Interactive Visualization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Neil Rubens,et al.  Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration , 2011 .

[9]  D. Green,et al.  Interactions matter—complexity in landscapes and ecosystems , 2005 .

[10]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[11]  Mark Huisman,et al.  Software for statistical analysis of social networks , 2004 .

[12]  Neil Rubens,et al.  A Network Analysis of Investment Firms as Resource Routers in Chinese Innovation Ecosystem , 2011, J. Softw..

[13]  Gregory L. Richards,et al.  The Information Technology Ecosystem: Structure, Health, and Performance , 2006 .

[14]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[15]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[16]  Neil Rubens,et al.  A Network-Centric Snapshot of Value Co-Creation in Finnish Innovation Financing , 2011 .

[17]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[18]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[19]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[20]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[21]  G. Breeuwsma Geruchten als besmettelijke ziekte. Het succesverhaal van de Hush Puppies. Bespreking van Malcolm Gladwell, The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. London: Little, Brown and Company, 2000 , 2000 .

[22]  Rahul C. Basole Visual Business Ecosystem Intelligence: Lessons from the Field , 2014, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[24]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[25]  Rachelle C. Sampson Organizational Choice in R&D Alliances: Knowledge Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives , 2004 .

[26]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[27]  A. Zaheer,et al.  It's the Connections: The Network Perspective in Interorganizational Research , 2010 .

[28]  Peter Smagorinsky,et al.  The Social Construction of Data: Methodological Problems of Investigating Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development , 1995 .

[29]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Visual Analytics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[30]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Managing in a “Small World Ecosystem”: Lessons from the Software Sector , 2006 .

[31]  Ron Adner,et al.  The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation , 2012 .

[32]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  Can you Trust a Single Data Source Exploratory Software Engineering Case Study? , 2002, Empirical Software Engineering.

[33]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  IT innovation adoption by enterprises: Knowledge discovery through text analytics , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  John Urry,et al.  Small Worlds and the New ‘Social Physics’ , 2004 .

[35]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[36]  C D Seuss,et al.  In-Depth Understanding: Teaching Search Engines to Interpret Meaning [Point of View] , 2011 .

[37]  Xuhui Chen,et al.  Classifying software visualization tools using the Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive domain , 2009, 2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[38]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[39]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Visual Analytics for Converging-Business-Ecosystem Intelligence , 2012, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[40]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[41]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[42]  Rahul C. Basole Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[43]  J. Brown,et al.  The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends On Productive Friction And Dynamic Specialization , 2005 .

[44]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[45]  I. Newman Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology : Exploring the Interactive Continuum , 1999 .

[46]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[47]  Victor W. Hwang,et al.  The Rainforest: The Secret to Building the Next Silicon Valley , 2012 .

[48]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[49]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Managing in a “ Small World Ecosystem ” : Some Lessons from the Software Sector ( TO APPEAR IN CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT , 2006 .

[50]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[51]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[52]  R. Penrose,et al.  A theory of everything? , 2005, Nature.

[53]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[54]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[55]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[56]  S. Smith Scholarship in the Digital Age , 2009 .

[57]  Bernhard Poerksen,et al.  The end of certainty , 1992 .

[58]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[60]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Value in triangulation: a comparison of two approaches for combining qualitative and quantitative methods , 1997 .

[61]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[62]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Governance in Social Media: A Case Study of the Wikipedia Promotion Process , 2010, ICWSM.

[63]  C. Perry,et al.  Qualitative Marketing Research , 2001 .

[64]  Mark Buchanan Small World : Uncovering Nature's Hidden Networks , 2002 .

[65]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[66]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Scientific Storytelling Using Visualization , 2012, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[67]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Are you a collaborative leader? , 2015, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[68]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[69]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[70]  David H. Hsu Venture Capitalists and Cooperative Start-Up Commercialization Strategy , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[71]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[72]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[73]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[74]  Melissa A. Schilling Understanding the Alliance Data , 2008 .

[75]  Peter Fox,et al.  Changing the Equation on Scientific Data Visualization , 2011, Science.

[76]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Value Transformation in the Mobile Service Ecosystem: A Study of App Store Emergence and Growth , 2012 .

[77]  H. Smith,et al.  Strategies of social research : the methodological imagination , 1976 .

[78]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[79]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[80]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Social Networks Applied , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[81]  John F. Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Organizations and Markets , 2012 .

[82]  Lorenzo Bizzi,et al.  Studying processes in and around networks , 2012 .

[83]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Comparing alliance network structure across industries: observations and explanations , 2007 .

[84]  A SchillingMelissa,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks , 2007 .

[85]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked - how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life , 2003 .

[86]  Chris North,et al.  Toward measuring visualization insight , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[87]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[88]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Defining Insight for Visual Analytics , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[89]  N. Leech,et al.  Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? , 2007 .

[90]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.