Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Generation Portfolio

Electric Vehicles (EVs) charged in a manner that is optimal to the power system will tend to increase the utilization of the lowest cost power generating units on the system, which in turn encourages investment in these preferable forms of generation. Were these gains to be substantial, they could be reflected in future charging tariffs as a means of encouraging EV ownership. However, where the impact of EVs is being quantified, much of the system benefit can only be observed where generator scheduling is performed by unit-commitment based methods. By making use of a rapid, yet robust unit-commitment algorithm, in the context of a capacity expansion procedure, this paper quantifies the impact of EVs for a variety of demand and wind time-series, relative fuel costs and EV penetrations. Typically, the net-cost of EV charging increases with EV penetration and CO2 cost, and falls with increasing wind. Frequently however these relationships do not apply, where changes in an input often lead to step-changes in the optimal plant mix. The impact of EVs is thus strongly dependent on the dynamics of the underlying generation portfolio.

[1]  P. T. Krein,et al.  Review of Battery Charger Topologies, Charging Power Levels, and Infrastructure for Plug-In Electric and Hybrid Vehicles , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[2]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Accommodating Variability in Generation Planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Filipe Joel Soares,et al.  Integration of Electric Vehicles in the Electric Power System , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  C.W. Gellings,et al.  The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  M O'Malley,et al.  Impact of optimal charging of electric vehicles on future generation portfolios , 2009, 2009 IEEE PES/IAS Conference on Sustainable Alternative Energy (SAE).

[6]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Environmental assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using naturalistic drive cycles and vehicle travel patterns: A Michigan case study , 2013 .

[7]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Preliminary Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on Wind Energy Markets , 2006 .

[8]  Tony Markel,et al.  Costs and Emissions Associated with Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging in the Xcel Energy Colorado Service Territory , 2007 .

[9]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Emissions impacts and benefits of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid services. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Jay Apt,et al.  The variability of interconnected wind plants , 2010 .

[11]  W. Short,et al.  Evaluation of Utility System Impacts and Benefits of Optimally Dispatched Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (Revised) , 2006 .

[12]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Base-Load Cycling on a System With Significant Wind Penetration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Juha Kiviluoma,et al.  Influence of wind power, plug-in electric vehicles, and heat storages on power system investments , 2010 .