B cells from hyper-IgM patients carrying UNG mutations lack ability to remove uracil from ssDNA and have elevated genomic uracil

The generation of high-affinity antibodies requires somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) at the immunoglobulin (Ig) locus. Both processes are triggered by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and require UNG-encoded uracil-DNA glycosylase. AID has been suggested to function as an mRNA editing deaminase or as a single-strand DNA deaminase. In the latter model, SHM may result from replicative incorporation of dAMP opposite U or from error-prone repair of U, whereas CSR may be triggered by strand breaks at abasic sites. Here, we demonstrate that extracts of UNG-proficient human B cell lines efficiently remove U from single-stranded DNA. In B cell lines from hyper-IgM patients carrying UNG mutations, the single-strand–specific uracil-DNA glycosylase, SMUG1, cannot complement this function. Moreover, the UNG mutations lead to increased accumulation of genomic uracil. One mutation results in an F251S substitution in the UNG catalytic domain. Although this UNG form was fully active and stable when expressed in Escherichia coli, it was mistargeted to mitochondria and degraded in mammalian cells. Our results may explain why SMUG1 cannot compensate the UNG2 deficiency in human B cells, and are fully consistent with the DNA deamination model that requires active nuclear UNG2. Based on our findings and recent information in the literature, we present an integrated model for the initiating steps in CSR.

[1]  M. Neuberger,et al.  Mismatch recognition and uracil excision provide complementary paths to both Ig switching and the A/T-focused phase of somatic mutation. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[2]  E. E. Max,et al.  Single-Stranded DNA Breaks Adjacent to Cytosines Occur during Ig Gene Class Switch Recombination , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  U. Storb,et al.  Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) can target both DNA strands when the DNA is supercoiled. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Lomax,et al.  Efficiency of repair of an abasic site within DNA clustered damage sites by mammalian cell nuclear extracts. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[5]  F. Alt,et al.  Replication protein A interacts with AID to promote deamination of somatic hypermutation targets , 2004, Nature.

[6]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Uracil DNA Glycosylase Activity Is Dispensable for Immunoglobulin Class Switch , 2004, Science.

[7]  C. E. Schrader,et al.  Deletion of the Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene Ercc1 Reduces Immunoglobulin Class Switching and Alters Mutations Near Switch Recombination Junctions , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[8]  P. Modrich,et al.  A defined human system that supports bidirectional mismatch-provoked excision. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[9]  T. Honjo,et al.  AID: how does it aid antibody diversity? , 2004, Immunity.

[10]  J. Wedekind,et al.  The structure of a yeast RNA-editing deaminase provides insight into the fold and function of activation-induced deaminase and APOBEC-1. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  53BP1 is required for class switch recombination , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  A. Taylor,et al.  Delineation of the Role of the Mre11 Complex in Class Switch Recombination* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  S. Nakajima,et al.  Functional and physical interactions between ERCC1 and MSH2 complexes for resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in mammalian cells. , 2004, DNA repair.

[14]  Y. Yokota,et al.  Transcription-Coupled Events Associating with Immunoglobulin Switch Region Chromatin , 2003, Science.

[15]  A. Fischer,et al.  Human uracil–DNA glycosylase deficiency associated with profoundly impaired immunoglobulin class-switch recombination , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[16]  R. Drillien,et al.  Characterisation of the substrate specificity of homogeneous vaccinia virus uracil-DNA glycosylase. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  F. Papavasiliou,et al.  AID Mediates Hypermutation by Deaminating Single Stranded DNA , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  A. Matsuda,et al.  Mammalian 5-formyluracil-DNA glycosylase. 2. Role of SMUG1 uracil-DNA glycosylase in repair of 5-formyluracil and other oxidized and deaminated base lesions. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[19]  F. Alt,et al.  Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme , 2003, Nature.

[20]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  ATM Is Not Required in Somatic Hypermutation of VH, but Is Involved in the Introduction of Mutations in the Switch μ Region1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[21]  M. Goodman,et al.  Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  F. Skorpen,et al.  hUNG2 Is the Major Repair Enzyme for Removal of Uracil from U:A Matches, U:G Mismatches, and U in Single-stranded DNA, with hSMUG1 as a Broad Specificity Backup* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  D. Barnes,et al.  Immunoglobulin Isotype Switching Is Inhibited and Somatic Hypermutation Perturbed in UNG-Deficient Mice , 2002, Current Biology.

[24]  Michel C. Nussenzweig,et al.  Genomic Instability in Mice Lacking Histone H2AX , 2002, Science.

[25]  F. Alt,et al.  IgH class switch recombination to IgG1 in DNA-PKcs-deficient B cells. , 2002, Immunity.

[26]  Jeremy M. Stark,et al.  Double-strand breaks and tumorigenesis. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[27]  D. Barnes,et al.  Excision of deaminated cytosine from the vertebrate genome: role of the SMUG1 uracil–DNA glycosylase , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[28]  A. Fischer,et al.  Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase (AID) Deficiency Causes the Autosomal Recessive Form of the Hyper-IgM Syndrome (HIGM2) , 2000, Cell.

[29]  T. Honjo,et al.  Class Switch Recombination and Hypermutation Require Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase (AID), a Potential RNA Editing Enzyme , 2000, Cell.

[30]  F. Skorpen,et al.  Base excision repair of DNA in mammalian cells , 2000, FEBS letters.

[31]  P. Freemont,et al.  Substitution of Asp-210 in HAP1 (APE/Ref-1) eliminates endonuclease activity but stabilises substrate binding. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  T. Lindahl,et al.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG)-deficient mice reveal a primary role of the enzyme during DNA replication. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[33]  M. Otterlei,et al.  Post‐replicative base excision repair in replication foci , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[34]  T. Honjo,et al.  Specific Expression of Activation-induced Cytidine Deaminase (AID), a Novel Member of the RNA-editing Deaminase Family in Germinal Center B Cells* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Identification of a new uracil-DNA glycosylase family by expression cloning using synthetic inhibitors , 1999, Current Biology.

[36]  M. Otterlei,et al.  Human mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylase preform (UNG1) is processed to two forms one of which is resistant to inhibition by AP sites. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  M. Otterlei,et al.  Nuclear and mitochondrial splice forms of human uracil-DNA glycosylase contain a complex nuclear localisation signal and a strong classical mitochondrial localisation signal, respectively. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Heikyung Suh,et al.  Ku80 is required for immunoglobulin isotype switching , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[39]  W. de Laat,et al.  DNA Structural Elements Required for ERCC1-XPF Endonuclease Activity* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  F. Skorpen,et al.  Nuclear and mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylases are generated by alternative splicing and transcription from different positions in the UNG gene. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  S. Benichou,et al.  A Sequence in the N-terminal Region of Human Uracil-DNA Glycosylase with Homology to XPA Interacts with the C-terminal Part of the 34-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  J. Tainer,et al.  Excision of cytosine and thymine from DNA by mutants of human uracil‐DNA glycosylase. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[43]  S. Balasubramanian,et al.  Tertiary Structure of Uracil-DNA Glycosylase Inhibitor Protein (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  J. Tainer,et al.  Crystal structure and mutational analysis of human uracil-DNA glycosylase: Structural basis for specificity and catalysis , 1995, Cell.

[45]  G. Bauw,et al.  Purification and determination of the NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of uracil-DNA glycosylase from human placenta. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[46]  H. Krokan,et al.  Uracil DNa-glycosylase from HeLa cells: general properties, substrate specificity and effect of uracil analogs. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.