MRMC ROC analysis of calcification detection in tomosynthesis using computed super resolution and virtual clinical trials

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reduces breast tissue overlap, which is a major limitation of digital mammography. However, DBT does not show significant improvement in calcification detection, because of the limited angle and small number of projections used to reconstruct the 3D breast volume. Virtual clinical trials (VCTs) were used to evaluate the benefits of computed super resolution (SR) and the optimal combination of the acquisition parameters to improve calcification detection in DBT. We simulated calcifications that were embedded into software breast phantoms. DBT projections of the breast phantoms with and without calcifications were synthesized. We simulated detector elements of 0.085 mm and reconstructed DBT images using 0.0425 mm and 0.085 mm voxels. Channelized Hotelling observers (CHOs) were trained and tested to simulate five virtual readers. Differences in area under the curve (AUC) between SR images and images synthesized with 0.085 mm voxels were calculated using the one-shot multiple-reader multiple-case receiver operator curve (MRMC ROC) methods. Our results show that the differences in AUC is approximately 0.10, 0.03 and 0.03 for DBT images simulated using calcifications sizes 0.001 mm3, 0.002 mm3, and 0.003 mm3, respectively. SR shows a substantial improvement for calcification detection in DBT. The impact of SR on calcification detection is more prominent for small calcifications.

[1]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Comparing the imaging performance of computed super resolution and magnification tomosynthesis , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Developing populations of software breast phantoms for virtual clinical trials , 2018, Other Conferences.

[3]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[4]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Multiple-reader, multiple-case ROC analysis for determining the limit of calcification detection in tomosynthesis , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized simulation of breast anatomy for virtual clinical trials , 2018, Other Conferences.

[7]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Brandon D Gallas,et al.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[9]  Frank W. Samuelson,et al.  Evaluation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as Replacement of Full-Field Digital Mammography Using an In Silico Imaging Trial , 2018, JAMA network open.

[10]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  OpenVCT: a GPU-accelerated virtual clinical trial pipeline for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[11]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. , 2015, Radiology.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Simulation and experimental validation of high-resolution test objects for evaluating a next-generation digital breast tomosynthesis prototype , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[13]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dynamic reconstruction and rendering of 3D tomosynthesis images , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[16]  C. Marchessoux,et al.  A Virtual Image Chain for Perceived and Clinical Image Quality of Medical Display , 2008, Journal of Display Technology.

[17]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Comparison of Channel Methods and Observer Models for the Task-Based Assessment of Multi-Projection Imaging in the Presence of Structured Anatomical Noise , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Premkumar Elangovan,et al.  Design and validation of realistic breast models for use in multiple alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Jules H Sumkin,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  med. Marton Lanyi Clinically Occult, Mammographically Suspicious Microcalcification Clusters: Pre-, Intra-, and Postoperative Measures , 1986 .

[21]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Virtual clinical trial of lesion detection in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[22]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms. , 2012, Medical physics.