An Expanded C2-Simulation Experimental Environment Based on BML

The NATO Modeling and Simulation Group Technical Activity 48 (MSG-048) was chartered in 2006 to investigate the potential of a Coalition Battle Management Language for multinational and NATO interoperation of command and control systems with simulation systems. Its work in defining and demonstrating a basic capability for this purpose has been reported in previous SIW papers. This paper addresses Phase 3 of the Technical Activity, which validated the BML paradigm by interoperation of multiple C2 and simulation systems in experimental support of operational military users. The new capability was the basis for a week-long event at Manassas, Virginia in November 2009, which was supported by a previous collaborative integration using the Internet. The experimental configuration combined six national C2 systems and five national simulations along with middleware from two other nations, including an updated BML server that implements the publish/subscribe paradigm for BML and a C2 Lexical Grammar interface that was used by several nations. BML provided a common C2-simulation linkage without humans in the information exchange loop. This paper provides a description of the experimental system of systems and results, along with the successes and lessons learned. The results support further development of the BML concept and should inform the work of the SISO C-BML Product Development Group. We conclude with a projection of the work of MSG-085, the successor to MSG-048, which will focus on operational and standardization issues.

[1]  Curtis Blais,et al.  Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Final Report , 2005 .

[2]  Ulrich Schade,et al.  Adding reports to coalition battle management language for NATO MSG-048 , 2009 .

[3]  Thomas Zöller,et al.  Application of BML to inter-agent communication in the ITSIMBW simulation environment , 2007, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.

[4]  J. Mark Pullen,et al.  Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler , 2004, Simul..

[5]  Curtis Blais Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Report , 2005 .

[6]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Using Web services and data mediation/storage services to enable command and control to simulation interoperability , 2005, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications.

[7]  Ulrich Schade,et al.  NATO MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Initial Demonstration Lessons Learned and Way Forward , 2008 .

[8]  Michael R. Hieb,et al.  The Environment in Network Centric Operations: A Framework for Command and Control , 2007 .

[9]  Samuel Suhas Singapogu,et al.  Interpreted Web Services as a Tool for Development of Command and Control Interoperability with Simulations , 2009, 2009 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications.

[10]  Ulrich Schade,et al.  Formalizing Battle Management Language : A Grammar for Specifying Orders , 2009 .

[11]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - US Contribution to the C-BML PDG , 2007 .

[12]  Leslie S. Winters,et al.  Composable M&S Web Services for Net-Centric Applications , 2006 .

[13]  A. Alstad,et al.  BML-enabling national C2 systems for coupling to Simulation , 2008 .

[14]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Integrating Air and Ground Operations Within a Common Battle Management Language , 2005 .

[15]  Battle Management Language: A Grammar for Specifying Reports , 2007 .

[16]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Developing a Coalition Battle Management Language to Facilitate Interoperability Between Operation CIS, and Simulations in Support of Training and Mission Rehearsal , 2005 .

[17]  Curtis Blais,et al.  Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - Phase 1 Development and Demonstration Results , 2007 .