A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.

The purpose of this work was to extend the verification of Monte Carlo based methods for estimating radiation dose in computed tomography (CT) exams beyond a single CT scanner to a multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner, and from cylindrical CTDI phantom measurements to both cylindrical and physical anthropomorphic phantoms. Both cylindrical and physical anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned on an MDCT under the specified conditions. A pencil ionization chamber was used to record exposure for the cylindrical phantom, while MOSFET (metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor) detectors were used to record exposure at the surface of the anthropomorphic phantom. Reference measurements were made in air at isocentre using the pencil ionization chamber under the specified conditions. Detailed Monte Carlo models were developed for the MDCT scanner to describe the x-ray source (spectra, bowtie filter, etc) and geometry factors (distance from focal spot to isocentre, source movement due to axial or helical scanning, etc). Models for the cylindrical (CTDI) phantoms were available from the previous work. For the anthropomorphic phantom, CT image data were used to create a detailed voxelized model of the phantom's geometry. Anthropomorphic phantom material compositions were provided by the manufacturer. A simulation of the physical scan was performed using the mathematical models of the scanner, phantom and specified scan parameters. Tallies were recorded at specific voxel locations corresponding to the MOSFET physical measurements. Simulations of air scans were performed to obtain normalization factors to convert results to absolute dose values. For the CTDI body (32 cm) phantom, measurements and simulation results agreed to within 3.5% across all conditions. For the anthropomorphic phantom, measured surface dose values from a contiguous axial scan showed significant variation and ranged from 8 mGy/100 mAs to 16 mGy/100 mAs. Results from helical scans of overlapping pitch (0.9375) and extended pitch (1.375) were also obtained. Comparisons between the MOSFET measurements and the absolute dose value derived from the Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate agreement in terms of absolute dose values as well as the spatially varying characteristics. This work demonstrates the ability to extend models from a single detector scanner using cylindrical phantoms to an MDCT scanner using both cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. Future work will be extended to voxelized patient models of different sizes and to other MDCT scanners.

[1]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  David J Brenner,et al.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  B. Wall,et al.  Organ Doses from Medical X-Ray Examinations Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques , 1985 .

[5]  N Petoussi-Henss,et al.  Organ dose conversion coefficients for external photon irradiation of male and female voxel models , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Nina Petoussi-Henss,et al.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  W Huda,et al.  Energy imparted in computed tomography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[8]  L. Wang,et al.  Development of tissue-simulating optical phantoms: poly-N-isopropylacrylamide solution entrapped inside a hydrogel. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Martin Caon,et al.  Monte Carlo Calculated Effective Dose to Teenage Girls from Computed Tomography Examinations , 2000 .

[10]  D. Peet,et al.  Evaluation of a MOSFET radiation sensor for the measurement of entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  David J Brenner,et al.  Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  S. Edyvean,et al.  CT scanner dosimetry. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  D. G. Jones,et al.  Normalised Organ Doses for X Ray Computed Tomography Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques and a Mathematical Anthropomorphic Phantom , 1993 .

[14]  C H McCollough,et al.  Calculation of effective dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[16]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[17]  B. Schmidt,et al.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography , 1999, European Radiology.

[18]  D. Hintenlang,et al.  The characterization of a commercial MOSFET dosimeter system for use in diagnostic x ray. , 1998, Health physics.

[19]  J. V. Atherton,et al.  Energy imparted and effective doses in computed tomography. , 1996, Medical physics.

[20]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M Caon,et al.  An EGS4-ready tomographic computational model of a 14-year-old female torso for calculating organ doses from CT examinations. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  D. Feigal,et al.  FDA public health notification: reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patients. , 2002, International journal of trauma nursing.

[26]  W Abmayr,et al.  The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference and realistic human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods. , 1986, Physics in medicine and biology.