Multi-Epoch Analysis of a Satellite Constellation to Identify Value Robust Deployment across Uncertain Futures

The value of a system depends heavily on the future contexts it will encounter. For complex space systems with multi-year design and deployment phases, it is useful to design a system so that it delivers value to stakeholders over a wide range of future contexts. EpochEra Analysis, a computational scenario planning approach, decomposes the lifecycle of a system into sequential epochs that each have fixed contexts and value expectations. This paper applies Multi-Epoch Analysis (a subset of Epoch-Era Analysis) along with MultiAttribute Tradespace Exploration (MATE) to the design of a satellite constellation, with the aim of maximizing value across a range of end-user subscription and geographic distribution contexts. The system level tradespace is assembled using a bottom-up iterative approach based on expert knowledge, and accounts for performance attributes metrics such as revisit times, data latencies, observation times, and data downlink volumes. Competing designs consisting of alternative orbital, ground station location, and deployment configurations are evaluated in terms of their fuzzy Normalized Pareto Trace (fNPT) across epochs. The resulting staged deployment strategy delivers robust value based on stakeholder preference across a wide range of future contexts.

[1]  M. E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Mitigating contextual uncertainties with valuable changeability analysis in the multi-epoch domain , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[2]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Scenario planning in dynamic multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[3]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2006 .

[4]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[5]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Role for Interactive Tradespace Exploration in Multi- Stakeholder Negotiations , 2010 .

[7]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Adam M. Ross Multi-attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2005 .

[9]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[10]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  An Iterative Subsystem-Generated Approach to Populating a Satellite Constellation Tradespace , 2011 .

[11]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Revisiting the Tradespace Exploration Paradigm: Structuring the Exploration Process , 2010 .

[12]  Armin P. Schulz,et al.  Design for changeability (DfC): Principles to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle , 2005, Syst. Eng..

[13]  Julia Nickel Using Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration for the Architecting and Design of Transportation Systems , 2010 .

[14]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  Flexibility: a multi-disciplinary literature review and a research agenda for designing flexible engineering systems , 2009 .

[15]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Using Pareto Trace to determine system passive value robustness , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[16]  M. E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Sustaining lifecycle value: Valuable changeability analysis with era simulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[17]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design , 2004 .