Deep Space 1 was the e rst interplanetary mission to be propelled by solar electric propulsion. The detailed design, development, and analysis of its trajectory have led to important new insights into the design of low-thrust trajectories. Tying the testing of solar electric propulsion technology to an operational mission has allowed the identie cation of trajectory design issues that were not considered in concept studies, such as constraints on the spacecraft attitude and periods of thrusting or coasting that are dictated by reasons other than trajectory considerations. Models of the spacecraft performance unimportant for trajectory analysisin missions using conventional chemical propulsion are intimately connected with the design of the trajectory when solar electric propulsion is employed.In addition, massmargin is notsufe cientto assessa low-thrustmission. Unplanned thrust interruptions may result in a situation in which the propulsion system cannot provide sufe cient impulse to compensate for the lost thrust in time to reach encounter targets. Mission margin (as distinct from mass margin ) is a quantie cation of the mission’ s susceptibility to loss of thrust and is an important indicator of mission robustness for low-thrust trajectories.
[1]
Marc D. Rayman,et al.
THE DEEP SPACE 1 EXTENDED MISSION
,
2001
.
[2]
John R. Anderson,et al.
Performance of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the Deep Space One mission
,
2001
.
[3]
Steven N. Williams,et al.
Mars Missions Using Solar Electric Propulsion
,
2000
.
[4]
David H. Lehman,et al.
Deep space one: NASA's first Deep-Space technology validation mission
,
1997
.
[5]
C. G. Sauer.
OPTIMIZATION OF MULTIPLE TARGET ELECTRIC PROPULSION TRAJECTORIES
,
1973
.
[6]
David H. Lehman,et al.
Results from the Deep Space 1 technology validation mission
,
2000
.
[7]
Victoria Coverstone-Carroll,et al.
Benefits of solar electric propulsion for the next generation of planetary exploration missions
,
1997
.