Comparison of Conventional, Compounding, Computer Enhancement, and Compounding With Computer Enhancement in Ultrasound Imaging of the Breast

Objective: Real-time spatial compounding and computer enhancement (CE) in ultrasound have become commercially available for better visualization of breast masses. This study evaluated image quality and diagnostic information using these techniques as compared with conventional ultrasound in breast imaging. Materials and Methods: One hundred consecutive lesions in 81 patients with clinically detectable breast lesions were imaged using conventional, compounding, CE, and compounding with CE. The images were blinded to technique and patient information and were then randomized. Three blinded reviewers analyzed the images and rated them for margin definition, near-field detail, definition of lesion, shadowing, and posterior enhancement on a scale of 1 (worse) to 5 (best) independently. The blinded reviewers then ranked the 4 images of the same lesion from best to worse. Results: The lesions included benign (81) and malignant (19) lesions. All reviewers selected compounding with CE 100% of the time as the best image, when the images of the same lesion were presented in a set. Compounding alone was selected second, CE was selected as third, and conventional imaging was selected as having the worst image quality in all cases. Individual image quality was compounding with CE, 4.86; compounding, 4.10; CE, 3.80; and conventional, 3.09; on the 5-point scale. Conclusion Compounding with CE significantly improves the image quality over conventional breast ultrasound. Compounding and CE enhance image quality when used individually, but the combination of the 2 techniques is superior.

[1]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[2]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[4]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.

[5]  W. Buchberger,et al.  Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  J. Thiran,et al.  Application of Adaptive Image Processing Technique to Real-Time Spatial Compound Ultrasound Imaging Improves Image Quality , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[7]  B A Porter,et al.  Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. , 2001, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[9]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[10]  Stuart S Kaplan,et al.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  E A Sickles,et al.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: A retrospective review , 1996, Cancer.