Guidelines for photography of cutaneous marks and injuries: a multi-professional perspective

Abstract Investigators assessing the likelihood of physical abuse, must make a decision as to whether the injury seen matches the explanation given. In some instances the pattern of these injuries can give the investigator a possible link to the cause of the injury. Thus, matching an injury pattern to an implement or weapon used has forensic implications. The current method of capturing patterned injuries together with poor scale placement often result in some form of distortion that causes a change to the shape of the patterned injury. The aim of this guideline is to assist individuals dealing with the capture of photographic evidence for the investigation of suspected non-accidental patterned cutaneous injuries (PCI), and to ensure high standards of image quality are met for both evidential records and for forensic analysis. The technical equipment specified within these guidelines are recommended by the authors as a basic requirement for imaging best practice, due to their ability to capture detailed and critical data. For precise pattern matching analysis, it is vital that both the injury and the suspected implement are photographed in accordance with this guidance.

[1]  D. R. Sheasby,et al.  A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[2]  J. Ortonne,et al.  Effectiveness of cross polarized light and fluorescence diagnosis for detection of sub‐clinical and clinical actinic keratosis during imiquimod treatment , 2010, Experimental dermatology.

[3]  Stella Martin-de las Heras,et al.  Effectiveness of Comparison Overlays Generated with DentalPrint© Software in Bite Mark Analysis * , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  C. Jenny,et al.  Who Slapped That Child? , 2008, Child maltreatment.

[5]  Adam J. Freeman,et al.  Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  F D Wright Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 2: A case study. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  Nathan Edwards Cross-Polarisation, Making it Practical , 2011, Journal of visual communication in medicine.

[8]  O. P. Murty,et al.  Physical injuries in fatal and non-fatal child abuse cases: A review of 16 years with hands on experience of 2 years in Malaysia , 2006 .

[10]  F D Wright,et al.  Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 1. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  T. Tanijiri,et al.  3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[12]  J. Jason Payne-James Rules and scales used in measurement in the forensic setting: measured—and found wanting! , 2012, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[13]  W G Hyzer,et al.  The Bite Mark Standard Reference Scale--ABFO No. 2. , 1988, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  Michael Anthony Raymond,et al.  An interesting application of infra-red reflection photography to blood splash pattern interpretation , 1986 .

[15]  T J David,et al.  Recapturing a five-month-old bite mark by means of reflective ultraviolet photography. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  A J Robertson,et al.  Cross-polarized photography in the study of enamel defects in dental paediatrics. , 1999, The Journal of audiovisual media in medicine.

[17]  Michael D. Jones,et al.  Focussing on the future: survey results on the image capture of patterned cutaneous injuries. , 2014, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[18]  Peter Plassmann,et al.  3D imaging for bite mark analysis , 2013 .

[19]  F. Dunstan,et al.  Which is the preferred image modality for paediatricians when assessing photographs of bruises in children? , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[20]  T C Krauss,et al.  The forensic science use of reflective ultraviolet photography. , 1985, Journal of forensic sciences.

[21]  A. Busuttil Accidental injuries in children , 2008 .

[22]  E Rizova,et al.  New photographic techniques for clinical evaluation of acne. , 2001, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[23]  N. J. Malik,et al.  Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[24]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  In vivo determination of skin near-infrared optical properties using diffuse optical spectroscopy. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[25]  Peter Plassmann,et al.  3D Imaging in Forensic Odontology , 2010, Journal of visual communication in medicine.