When betting odds and credences come apart: more worries for Dutch book arguments

If an agent believes that the probability of E being true is 1/2, should she accept a bet on E at even odds or better? Yes, but only given certain conditions. This paper is about what those conditions are. In particular, we think that there is a condition that has been overlooked so far in the literature. We discovered it in response to a paper by Hitchcock (2004) in which he argues for the 1/3 answer to the Sleeping Beauty problem. Hitchcock argues that this credence follows from calculating her fair betting odds, plus the assumption that Sleeping Beauty’s credences should track her fair betting odds. We will show that this last assumption is false. Sleeping Beauty’s credences should not follow her fair betting odds due to a peculiar feature of her epistemic situation.

[1]  William J. Talbott,et al.  Two principles of Bayesian epistemology , 1991 .

[2]  David Christensen,et al.  Clever Bookies and Coherent Beliefs , 1991 .

[3]  Christopher Hitchcock,et al.  Beauty and the Bets , 2004, Synthese.

[4]  M. Schervish,et al.  When Fair Betting Odds Are Not Degrees of Belief , 1990, PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[5]  P. Maher Betting on Theories , 1993 .

[6]  A. Elga Defeating Dr. Evil with Self-Locating Belief , 2004 .