A Protocol to Select High Quality Datasets of Ecotoxicity Values for Pesticides

Abstract The key to any QSAR model is the underlying dataset. In order to construct a reliable dataset to develop a QSAR model for pesticide toxicity, we have derived a protocol to critically evaluate the quality of the underlying data. In developing an appropriate protocol that would enable data to be selected in constructing a QSAR, we concentrated on one toxicity end point, the 96 h LC50 from the acute rainbow trout study. This end point is key in pesticide regulation carried out under 91/414/EEC. The dataset used for this exercise was from the US EPA-OPP database.

[1]  Graham Matthews,et al.  The Pesticide Manual , 1998 .

[2]  Shijin Ren,et al.  Ecotoxicity prediction using mechanism- and non-mechanism-based QSARs: a preliminary study. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[3]  John D. Walker,et al.  Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: a historical perspective , 2003 .

[4]  W. Slob,et al.  Mathematical modelling and quantitative methods. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  John D. Walker Applications of QSARs in toxicology: a US Government perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Mark T D Cronin,et al.  Essential and desirable characteristics of ecotoxicity quantitative structure–activity relationships , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[7]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  The present status of QSAR in toxicology , 2003 .

[8]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  How accurate are the European Union's classifications of chemical substances. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[9]  E Benfenati,et al.  Factors Influencing Predictive Models for Toxicology , 2001, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[10]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  A. Worth,et al.  ECVAM's Activities on Computer Modelling and Integrated Testing , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[12]  J W Bridges,et al.  Hazard identification by methods of animal-based toxicology. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[13]  C. Russom,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) , 1997 .

[14]  T W Schultz,et al.  Structure-toxicity relationships for selected halogenated aliphatic chemicals. , 1999, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[15]  John C Dearden,et al.  Guidelines for developing and using quantitative structure‐activity relationships , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.