Almost an MNC: Bitcoin Entrepreneurs' Use of Collective Resources and Decoupling to Build Legitimacy

Studies of legitimacy have typically looked at the creation and maintenance of legitimacy by both established and new organisations. This paper looks at how a set of entrepreneurs use the legitimacy of one, Alternative, community as a scaffold to build legitimacy in a more Mainstream one, despite the fact that norms between the two were often contradictory. Studying Bitcoin entrepreneurs in Europe, we find that the distributed, digital community of Bitcoin operates as a kind of MNC: the larger decentralised (and Alternative) community acts as the headquarters, while the local entrepreneurs seeking Mainstream legitimacy behave like subsidiaries. This allow them to rely on the legitimacy of the community at large, while simultaneously distinguishing themselves from the broader Bitcoin community as they seek legitimacy.

[1]  Brian Kelly,et al.  The Bitcoin Big Bang: How Alternative Currencies Are About to Change the World , 2014 .

[2]  S A R A H M E I K L E J O H N,et al.  A Fistful of Bitcoins Characterizing Payments Among Men with No Names , 2013 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[4]  François-Xavier de Vaujany,et al.  If These Walls Could Talk: The Mutual Construction of Organizational Space and Legitimacy , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[5]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[6]  Pamela Baxter,et al.  Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers , 2008 .

[7]  William B. Gartner,et al.  Acting as If: Differentiating Entrepreneurial from Organizational Behavior , 1992 .

[8]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics , 2013 .

[9]  Jean Lee,et al.  The motivation of women entrepreneurs in Singapore , 1996 .

[10]  Carl F. Fey,et al.  The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on MNC Subsidiary Performance in Russia , 2000 .

[11]  Jeremy Papp.  A Medium of Exchange for an Internet Age: How to Regulate Bitcoin for the Growth of E-Commerce , 2015 .

[12]  C. Oliver,et al.  The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective , 2007 .

[13]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations , 1992 .

[14]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Aaron Yelowitz,et al.  Characteristics of Bitcoin users: an analysis of Google search data , 2014 .

[16]  Paul A. Samuelson,et al.  What Classical and Neoclassical Monetary Theory Really was , 1968 .

[17]  T. Kostova,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise , 1999 .

[18]  Harro van Lente,et al.  Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[20]  Scott L. Newbert.  New Firm Formation: A Dynamic Capability Perspective , 2005 .

[21]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[22]  Jerry Brito,et al.  Bitcoin: A Primer for Policymakers , 2016 .

[23]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[24]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[26]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[28]  Karen Golden-Biddle,et al.  Breaches in the Boardroom: Organizational Identity and Conflicts of Commitment in a Nonprofit Organization , 1997 .

[29]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[30]  Scott L. Newbert,et al.  Exploring the Determinants of Organizational Emergence: A Legitimacy Perspective , 2007 .

[31]  Y. Doz,et al.  Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm , 1991 .

[32]  B. Maurer,et al.  “When perhaps the real problem is money itself!”: the practical materiality of Bitcoin , 2013 .

[33]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[34]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[35]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[36]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Entrepreneurial Storytelling, Future Expectations, and the Paradox of Legitimacy , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[37]  S. Shane,et al.  Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures , 2004 .

[38]  Paul Steidlmeier,et al.  The moral legitimacy of intellectual property claims: American business and developing country perspectives , 1993 .

[39]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[40]  Eleanor Shaw,et al.  Apostasy versus legitimacy: Relational dynamics and routes to resource acquisition in entrepreneurial ventures , 2014 .

[41]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  12 Entrepreneurship: A Field of Dreams? , 2008 .

[42]  Nicolaj Siggelkow.  Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[43]  Robin Teigland,et al.  Breaking Out of the Bank in Europe - Exploring Collective Emergent Institutional Entrepreneurship Through Bitcoin , 2013 .

[44]  Reuben Grinberg.  Bitcoin: An Innovative Alternative Digital Currency , 2011 .

[45]  J. Fereday,et al.  Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development , 2006 .