Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes in atrophic and hydronephrotic kidneys.

OBJECTIVE To compare the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with atrophic and hydronephrotic kidneys. MATERIAL AND METHODS Clinical data were collected from 35 patients who had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomies for atrophic or hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys between January 2010 and March 2014. Comparative analysis was carried out between the two groups examining demographic characteristics, imaging modalities, etiology, operative times, port numbers, conversion to open surgery, complications, pre-and post-operative hemoglobin and creatinine values, transfusion rates and length of hospital stays. RESULTS Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed for atrophic kidneys in 20 (57%) patients and for hydronephrotic kidneys in 15 (42%) patients. In the atrophic group, 3 patients (15%) required transfusion because of bleeding but none of the patients required conversion to open surgery. In the hydronephrotic group one patient (6.6%) required transfusion and conversion to open surgery because of bleeding. Both of the groups were similar in terms of postoperative hospital stay but compared to the atrophic kidneys, hydronephrotic ones were associated with a longer total operative times (90.1 min vs. 73.6 min, p=0.03). Any serious complication (except for bleeding) and mortality were not encountered in both groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic nephrectomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique that can be used in atrophic and hydronephrotic non-functioning kidneys.

[1]  P. Plante,et al.  Urological complications of laparoscopic surgery: experience with 350 procedures at a single center. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[2]  A. Hemal,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: a single-center experience. , 2001, Urology.

[3]  G. Sung,et al.  Techniques in Endourology Retroperitoneoscopic Approach to Nephrectomy , 1999 .

[4]  F. Bruyère,et al.  [Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy]. , 1999, Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie.

[5]  P Fornara,et al.  Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[6]  A. Hemal,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign diseases of the kidney: prospective nonrandomized comparison with open surgical nephrectomy. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[7]  G. Sung,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic approach to nephrectomy. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[8]  D. Tolley,et al.  A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. , 1998, British journal of urology.

[9]  P. Alken,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[10]  J. Rassweiler,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[11]  P. Alken,et al.  Nephrectomy: A Comparative Study between the Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic versus the Open Approach , 1998, European Urology.

[12]  I. Gill Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. , 1998, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[13]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[14]  R. Clayman,et al.  Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. , 1994, Urology.

[15]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[16]  H. Hasson A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. , 1971, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.