Top-down versus bottom-up control of autotrophic biomass—a meta-analysis on experiments with periphyton

Nutrient supply and herbivore presence can regulate plant biomass. The relative impact of both of these factors, and their interactions, on periphyton biomass were examined in a quantitative meta-analysis. A literature survey revealed 85 experiments with factorial and replicated manipulation of grazer access and nutrient supply. Two measures of effect sizes were calculated for each experiment, one based on final biomass yields (Hedges’ d) and the other on rates (Δr). Grazers significantly reduced periphyton biomass across all experiments, whereas nutrient addition significantly increased periphyton biomass. Effect sizes were very large for both factors. Thus, periphyton can be viewed as highly controlled by top-down and bottom-up mechanisms. Grazer effects were greater than nutrient effects. This result would be expected because nutrient enrichment represents a relative relief from nutrient limitation, whereas grazer exclusion represents a categorical removal of grazing pressure. Moreover, nutrient uptake and growth response are time-lagged, whereas grazer effects are more immediate. The assembled data set was used to test for significant impacts of the habitat and of the experimental design on the importance of grazers and nutrients. Both factors had consistent effects in streams, lakes, and coastal environments, although some variation in effect strength was found. Background productivity levels also did not affect the main effects, but increases in periphyton biomass led to increasing grazer effects and decreasing nutrient effects. The interaction between grazing and nutrients differed between habitats from different aquatic realms and with different productivity. The interaction metric for Hedges’ d was significantly positive for lakes and coasts, indicating a greater impact of nutrients in the absence of herbivores than in their presence. No such interaction was found for streams or for mesotrophic habitats. Similar trends were evident for Δr. The experimental design profoundly affected the effects of grazers and nutrients on periphyton biomass, with regard to type of grazer manipulation, type of nutrient enrichment, and duration of the experiment. This outcome indicated the crucial role of a careful experimental design.

[1]  Grazer control of nutrient availability in the periphyton , 1991, Oecologia.

[2]  S. Francoeur Meta-analysis of lotic nutrient amendment experiments: detecting and quantifying subtle responses , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  R. Norris,et al.  Problems with the use of terracotta clay saucers as phosphorus-diffusing substrata to assess nutrient limitation of epilithic algae , 2001 .

[4]  P. Mccormick Evaluating the multiple mechanisms underlying herbivore-algal interactions in streams , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[5]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[6]  H. Lotze,et al.  Strong bottom‐up and top‐down control of early life stages of macroalgae , 2001 .

[7]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Seasonally shifting limitation of stream periphyton: response of algal populations and assemblage biomass and productivity to variation in light, nutrients, and herbivores , 2000 .

[8]  G. Lamberti 17 – The Role of Periphyton in Benthic Food Webs , 1996 .

[9]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Habitat Heterogeneity and Algal-Grazer Interactions in Streams: Explorations with a Spatially Explicit Model , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  H. L. Boston,et al.  Grazers and Nutrients Simultaneously Limit Lotic Primary Productivity , 1992 .

[11]  Craig W. Osenberg,et al.  META‐ANALYSIS OF MARINE NUTRIENT‐ENRICHMENT EXPERIMENTS: VARIATION IN THE MAGNITUDE OF NUTRIENT LIMITATION , 1999 .

[12]  M. Kawata,et al.  Interactions between neighboring algae and snail grazing in structuring microdistribution patterns of periphyton , 2001 .

[13]  U. Sommer Selectivity of Idothea chelipes (Crustacea: Isopoda) grazing on benthic microalgae , 1997 .

[14]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Michael T. Brett,et al.  Consumer Versus Resource Control in Freshwater Pelagic Food Webs , 1997, Science.

[16]  N. Poff,et al.  Herbivory under different flow regimes: a field experiment and test of a model with a benthic stream insect , 1995 .

[17]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity , 2001 .

[18]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  North Atlantic Oscillation signatures in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems—a meta‐analysis , 2002 .

[19]  J. Eaton,et al.  Do submerged aquatic plants influence periphyton community composition for the benefit of invertebrate mutualists , 2000 .

[20]  J. Elwood,et al.  Role of Nutrient Cycling and Herbivory in Regulating Periphyton Communities in Laboratory Streams , 1991 .

[21]  C. Robinson,et al.  RESOURCE LIMITATION IN A STREAM COMMUNITY: PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT EFFECTS ON PERIPHYTON AND GRAZERS' , 1990 .

[22]  R. Lowe,et al.  Independent and interactive effects of nutrients and grazers on benthic algal community structure , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[23]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Species Turnover and the Regulation of Trophic Structure , 1997 .

[24]  J. Richardson,et al.  Interactions among Nutrients, Periphyton, and Invertebrate and Vertebrate (Ascaphus truei) Grazers in Experimental Channels , 2001, Copeia.

[25]  U. Sommer,et al.  Response of epilithic microphytobenthos of the Western Baltic Sea to in situ experiments with nutrient enrichment , 1997 .

[26]  A. Cattaneo,et al.  The effect of grazer size manipulation on periphyton communities , 1986, Oecologia.

[27]  A. Rosemond Interactions among irradiance, nutrients, and herbivores constrain a stream algal community , 1993, Oecologia.

[28]  A. Cattaneo,et al.  Empirical analysis of the removal rate of periphyton by grazers , 1995, Oecologia.

[29]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[30]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis with Resampling Tests. Version 1.Michael S. Rosenberg , Dean C. Adams , Jessica Gurevitch , 1998 .

[31]  M. Power,et al.  TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP FORCES IN FOOD WEBS: DO PLANTS HAVE PRIMACY? , 1992 .

[32]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Effect Size in Ecological Experiments: The Application of Biological Models in Meta‐Analysis , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[33]  R. Nisbet,et al.  Effects of Multiple, Predator‐Induced Behaviors on Short‐term Producer‐Grazer Dynamics in Open Systems , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  RESOLVING ECOLOGICAL QUESTIONS THROUGH META‐ANALYSIS: GOALS, METRICS, AND MODELS , 1999 .

[35]  A. Steinman,et al.  Effects of Three Herbivores on Periphyton Communities in Laboratory Streams , 1987, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[36]  R. Roijackers,et al.  Effects of nutrient loading and insecticide application on the ecology of Elodea-dominated freshwater microcosms. II. Responses of macrophytes, periphyton and macroinvertebrate grazers. , 1995 .

[37]  R. Paine,et al.  Effects of productivity, consumers, competitors, and El Niño events on food chain patterns in a rocky intertidal community. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[39]  M. Hay,et al.  CAN QUANTITY REPLACE QUALITY? FOOD CHOICE, COMPENSATORY FEEDING, AND FITNESS OF MARINE MESOGRAZERS , 2000 .

[40]  R. Wetzel 20 – Benthic Algae and Nutrient Cycling in Lentic Freshwater Ecosystems , 1996 .

[41]  Interactive Effects of Nutrient Reduction and Herbivory on Biomass, Taxonomic Structure, and P Uptake in Lotic Periphyton Communities , 1991 .

[42]  L. Hedges,et al.  Meta-analysis: Combining the results of independent experiments , 1993 .

[43]  J. Marks,et al.  The independent and interactive effects of snail grazing and nutrient enrichment on structuring periphyton communities , 1989, Hydrobiologia.

[44]  G. Fairchild,et al.  Effects of nutrient (N, P, C) enrichment, grazing and depth upon littoral periphyton of a softwater lake , 1989, Hydrobiologia.

[45]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta‐analysis of Field Experiments , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[46]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Meta‐analysis, can it ever fail? , 2002 .

[47]  H. Lotze,et al.  Marine microbenthic community structure regulated by nitrogen loading and grazing pressure , 2000 .

[48]  W. Wilson,et al.  PRIMARY-PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENTS AND SHORT-TERM POPULATION DYNAMICS IN OPEN SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[49]  A. J. Stewart Responses of stream algae to grazing minnows and nutrients: a field test for interactions , 1987, Oecologia.

[50]  Orlando Sarnelle,et al.  Nutrient Enrichment and Grazer Effects on Phytoplankton in Lakes , 1992 .

[51]  J. Lawton Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[52]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  BIOVOLUME CALCULATION FOR PELAGIC AND BENTHIC MICROALGAE , 1999 .

[53]  C. Goldman,et al.  A meta-analysis of the freshwater trophic cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  A. Hershey,et al.  BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF A TUNDRA RIVER TO FERTILIZATION , 1993 .

[55]  R. Horner,et al.  Stream periphyton response to grazing and changes in phosphorus concentration , 1995, Hydrobiologia.

[56]  R. Wetzel,et al.  Relative effects of nutrient enrichment and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) dynamics , 1993, Oecologia.

[57]  U. Sommer The susceptibility of benthic microalgae to periwinkle (Littorina littorea, Gastropoda) grazing in laboratory experiments , 1999 .

[58]  P. Murtaugh,et al.  JOURNAL QUALITY, EFFECT SIZE, AND PUBLICATION BIAS IN META-ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[59]  S. Fretwell Food chain dynamics: the central theory of ecology? , 1987 .

[60]  John R. Post,et al.  BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN IMPACTS ON FRESHWATER PELAGIC COMMUNITY STRUCTURE' , 1989 .

[61]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Interactions between Stream Herbivores and Periphyton: A Quantitative Analysis of past Experiments , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[62]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Control of Stream Periphyton: Effects of Nutrients and Herbivores , 1993 .

[63]  L. Crowder,et al.  COMPLEX INTERACTIONS OF FISH, SNAILS, AND LITTORAL ZONE PERIPHYTON , 1998 .